The Regender Challenge
The other day Darksidecat introduced me to what I now consider to be the Greatest Webpage Ever (this week): Regender, a handy tool that will take any web page and, well, regender it, turning male pronouns and references into female and vice versa. It even works with names.
Following Darksidecat’s lead, I have started plugging the writings of some of my favorite manosphere misogynists into the magical regendering machine. The results are, well, instructive. And frequently hilarious. As DSC noted, Roissy and MarkyMark are perfect for this sort of treatment. As is, I discovered, MarkyMark’s longtime pal Christopher in Oregon. Here’s what happens when Christopher of Oregon becomes Christine of Oregon with the help of regender, and all the horrible shit he wrote about women becomes the horrible shit she wrote about men:
Men are whores. They are far more likely to have STD’s than women. Be aware of this. Handle with extreme care. Men are filthy, and they will lie about their infections. Condoms will NOT protect you. …
Men are walking cesspools of filth! Most of them have or will have a permanent STD infection. It is unavoidable. These are FACTS, and not the rantings of an unstable misandrist.
(I’m a very STABLE misandrist, thank you kindly)
Men are DIRTY creatures, pure and simple. Be dignified, and don’t lower yourself to engaging in any filthy behavior with them. You WILL be infected with the diseases they are carrying. A moral, dignified woman does NOT rut like an animal with one of these creatures. Sexual intercourse and oral sex are filthy, disgusting activities, and ruin a woman morally. They spread disease.
Elevate yourself above such filth of the flesh. …
Do not lust after men in your mind. Masturbate only as a last result to relieve tension. Do not lust after men sexually. It weakens you.
Goddess made woman in Her image, and men was made in the image of Satan. Squeal all you want, but history proves me right. A man is a test; a stumbling block for woman. Our life is an adventure. A journey. A pursuit of our creator, and a pursuit of excellence in our personal lives. A man and his filth is part of the obstacle course set before us. If we are wise, and avoid them, we will grow stronger as a result. We will finish the race successfully.
Men was not put here to support us as such, and we will only grow stronger if we AVOID his snares. ..
Christine in Oregon
Woah. Critics of Man Boobz often say that feminists are “just as bad” as the guys I quote. Well, if they were, the posts on their blogs would look a lot like this regendered post. I ask all of you: have you ever seen something so grotesquely misandrist on any feminist web site? I thought not.
Here’s a challenge for all of you: See if you can come up with a regendered post that tops this one from “Christine in Oregon.” You can draw from old posts of mine, or go poking about in the manosphere yourself. Post your results in the thread below, along with a link to the regendered web page you got them from. I’ll highlight the best in a future post.
Posted on July 2, 2011, in men who should not ever be with women ever, MGTOW, MGTOW paradox, misandry, misogyny, MRA, precious bodily fluids, sex. Bookmark the permalink. 1,138 Comments.
NWOslave, I know your computer doesn’t have sound. That’s a shame, as Gilbert and Sullivan are delightful.
[21:07] Ami: i think he’s trying to say
[21:07] Ami: that since he’s NEVER right
[21:07] Ami: if he said 1+1=2
[21:07] Ami: it means we believe it doesn’t
[21:07] Kirby: he’s the only one who says he is never right
[21:07] Kirby: so he isn’t right about never being right
[21:07] Kirby.com: and so its all good
[21:08] Kirby: its the false paradox of “I always lie”
that was an hour and a half ago xD
so not only were we aware of it, Kirby called it xD
(and yus Kirby and me are ttlly making out while this is going on )
I forgot to take out a .com xD (but that doesn’t mean he’s Kirby.com xD )
Apparently I’m a… home cleaning system sales website? http://kirby.com/
Shit Ami, I’ve been called every name in the book by you fine folks. And to be honest, I believe you would literally trample men to save a “tranny” from having their precious feelings hurt.
Thats the “kind” of person you are. A “trannys” hurt feelings is more important to you than a starving straight man. Thats why I consider you vile. A “trannys” hurt feelings is more important to you than a straight man who is in genuine distress.
I’ve seriously had enough of you pillars of society.
Good night.
I knew the flounce couldn’t be far off. But will he stick it?
He flounced already? what am I going to do with the rest of my night?
…
God, that’s sad.
Ahhh! I left out a capitalisation!
I saw it just as I pressed “post comment”. I screamed internally as I saw the spinny-thing spin.
Oh well.
oh ok.. that’s it? xD
not “she-he” or “shemale” or “ladyboy”? xD
I guess those are exclusionary to FtMs.. which means NWO might be a better person than we think! :D
I’m still curious.. this is like the third time he’s accused me of trampling over starving straight (as if trans ppl can’t be straight xD ) men (as if trans ppl can’t be men xD ) to help trans ppl (as if trans ppl can’t be starving xD)
but he hasn’t said WHY he thinks this or what I do? xD
A “trannys” hurt feelings is more important to you than a straight man who is in genuine distress.
He must have cameras on me! I did that just yesterday! xD
And now he’s done xD He played this ENTIRE THREAD wrong xD
“Tranny”, seriously? NWO, that is extremely offensive, even for you. Fuck off.
Shame on you, Ami. Men are dying because they can’t use transphobic slurs. If you’d only let them degrade and insult you, these men could live!
I actually expected something worse from him o_o Tranny is like the generic slur… I mean I get annoyed by it if the news uses it like yesterday >_<;;; But w/ NWO, he's been saying how he's censoring himself cuz he's afraid of being banned, I expected like… something that would shatter my computer screen xD
and Alex, I asked him to tell me what he was thinking… I had a feeling it was tranny but I was hoping it'd be something I've never heard before xD
He’s putting quotation marks around “tranny” as if anybody in the thread, besides him, were using the word.
Ha Ha. Parts of that screed sound a lot like some of the “sex no-ed” talks given by some of the creepier Sunday school teachers to us girls. We weren’t even 11, but i guess it was important to scare the shit out of us about boys before we hit puberty, or something. Of course, once we got married all the dangers and evils were… actually she never said what happened then. I guess we were supposed to assume married people never ever had problems with STDs, or scary and maybe abusive husbands, or random hateful gibberish with no basis in reality.
And of course he still doesn’t provide a quote, nor does he even back out saying he’ll look for one. It’s like he knows he is wrong, but just can’t admit it.
NWOSlave: I have no idea what “helping a starving straight man” and “not being a douche to trans people” have to do with each other. Lots of people manage to do BOTH.
OHSHIII: Ohmigod, abstinence-only. I love it. Were you told that girls don’t have a sex drive and just want love and emotions, and that we shouldn’t read romance novels because that’s girl porn?
@Ami,
Yeah, I guess he could have come up with something worse (don’t know what). I don’t know; there are just some words that strike a chord of violence with me. I literally flinch when people say them in person around me.
TRIGGER WARNING: I’m about to list them.
Cunt, nigger, tranny, negro, whore, paki, chink, kike, jap, squaw, and others I can’t call to mind at present. When people use them when speaking directly to me, I always ask them not to. Sometimes they’re receptive, sometimes they ignore me, and sometimes they pull the “PC” card.
Yeah, I figured that might be held in moderation…(contains some offensive words as examples).
I hate NWO-Manboobz debates. I think it’s over now? I posted under a different a few times today and I stick by what I said then- MRAs can be very hateful. So can radfems. But MRAs are grounded in a reasonable assertion- men’s rights. Radfems are grounded in a fantasy goal of uprooting all of society for- what? Femanarchy? Regular anarchy? I don’t know. It’s not realistic.
Here are some comments regarding the J. Crew ad of a boy with pink nail polish regendered:
“Yeah, well, it may be fun and games now, Jeffrey, but at least put some money aside for psychotherapy for the kid—and maybe a little for others who’ll be affected by your “innocent” pleasure.”
“The fallout is already being seen. Increasingly, boys show none of the reticence they once did to engage in early sexual relationships with girls. That may be a good thing from the standpoint of gender equality, but it could be a bad thing since there is no longer the same typically “masculine” brake on such behavior. Boys beat up other boys on YouTube. Young women primp and preen until their abdomens are washboards and their hair is perfect. And while that may seem like no big deal, it will be a very big deal if it turns out that neither gender is very comfortable anymore nurturing children above all else, and neither gender is motivated to rank creating a family above having great sex forever and neither gender is motivated to protect the nation by marching into combat against other women and risking their lives.”
“I co-signed! Im against the media trying to make us women into sissies! Im thinking these feminazis in U.S. Hates an hard-working established woman”
“Well, I’m an atheist and I don’t want to see feminized girls and emasculated women.
I find it disgusting that anyone would try to bring up their children in a way that girls or boys are “encouraged” to “explore their sexuality”. That is fucking insane and if anything constitutes “child abuse”, that would be it.
So, would you mind explaining this to me: what the hell does a lack of belief in Goddess (atheism) have to do with feminized girls or homosexuality or masculism or anarchism for that matter?”
another delightful jem:
“I am gay and I think women should be women… and be proud to be women… I don’t want to be with a flamer.
I think masculists encourage gay women to act like men so they can get the shit beat out of them and then masculists can feel like a wrong is righted on their behalf…. and none of them realize it.”
NWO,
I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: I consider you to be somewhere between a pig and the average intestinal parasite, depending on the parasite. So not all hope is lost.
Like I said, you come here and act like a dick, then you are shocked–shocked, I tell you–when people respond in kind. If you want people to stop treating you like a dick, then stop being a dick.
Frankly, I think you like it. Else, why would you keep coming back?
.
Hey! There can’t be another Alex! There can’t! I-I-I shake a fish at you!
Kirbywarp: Although I no longer define as a radical feminist, I did from soon after the time I first became a feminist (approx. 1981-2 upon reading Simone de Beauvoir and Betty Friedan). (The professor who got me started on feminisms was a male faculty member in my department who was a feminist and asked me one day in class if I’d ever read any feminist works, and I said no.) I defined myself that way until about the mid-90s when I began to study the critiques by feminists of color and womanists (Alice Walker coined the term “womanist” to emphasize that given the racism in feminism, there would be women of color who could not use the term/concept work with those groups). 1970s feminisms varied even then: this is overly simplified, but think of NOW as a reform group–of mostly white middle-class women who thought changing some laws and doing some educating would solve problems; there were radical feminists like Robin Morgan and others (not entirely white–Morgan worked with Florynce Kennedy), who argued that the whole foundation of the patriarchy was wrong and needed to be changed, not just reformed to let some white women in, and took non-violent methodologies from the civil rights protest movements. There were feminists like Valerie Solanis (SCUM) and others who were very much kill the men, or become a separatist (lesbian feminist), who were in a sense advocating violent revolution. I read Dworkin (ALL her work), and Mackinnon (and the 1980s sex wars showed how conflict can happen among feminists as anti-pornography and pro-sex groups were in major debate). In other words, I’ve read a whole lot of feminist works because I did my dissertation on it and teach this stuff, as well as try to live it (without in fact flunking every male student, or roaming campus beating up on male faculty and staff).
The vast majority of feminists never were or are about all men are rapists, or kill the men. The vast majority never were or are radical feminists (by any of multiple definitions). The vast majority never were or are lesbian separatists (though all those are used to attack women who say they are feminists-in fact NOW had a “violet purge” back in the day: Rita Mae Browne has written about it).
There is a feminist argument that is more or less “any man could be a rapist” — that reflects the fact that rapists are not in fact all thuggish strange men lurking in alleys outside bars waiting to rape women coming out (NWO’s, I think, lovely theory)–i.e. the theory discounts the idea that a ‘rapist’ can be recognized by his “rapist characteristics.” (The “rapists are all identifiable so how dare that woman not smile at me, a complete stranger on the street” theory is v. similar to idea that terrorists can be identified by physical appearance, so brown men are profiled, and white men who blow things up are never called terrorists.)
Since any man can be a rapist (including men a woman is related to, friends with, married to, or dating), that’s the world women live in. I do not see that statement that “any many COULD be a rapist, I just don’t know” as the same thing as “I KNOW every many is a rapist.” But it’s often oversimplified that way. All the women I know who were raped were raped by men they knew (one as young as ten–by her father).
@ithiliana,
That sounds fascinating! I’m hoping to take at least a course in Women’s Studies this fall, but I have to see if it will conflict with work (full-time job) or not.
@ Alex
Bwahhahahahaha! I’M STEALING YOUR IDENTITY! j/k
@ithiliana:
When I read “shrodinger’s rapist” for the first time, it really did sound like it was saying all men are rapists, because I was looking at it from a male perspective. But realizing it wasn’t about me, it was about women, gave me an epiphany. It too was emphasizing that rapists aren’t all thuggish guys waiting in an allyway, even people you know, who are nice to you and all, could be a rapist. (In fact, the “could be a rapist” wasn’t even the point, it was a “understand that we women have to be cautious around men because we can’t read minds” type of thing)
I did know already that “The vast majority of feminists never were or are about all men are rapists, or kill the men,” I figured it was the domain of “radfems.” But of course, even that is a generalization, and I was glad to find that out. Especially since the standard MRM fare seems to be radical…
Maybe he’s suggesting that world hunger could be alleviated if only straight men were allowed to eat trans people. Sounds like a modest proposal.
Cosmos: Did you ever leave a source for your regendering piece? Cause if it’s not attributed, I don’t buy it.
Lady Victoria: I was a radical feminist between about 1982 and 1995 or so, roughly, and I would totally agree with your core definition–though I learned it was patriarchal foundation that was so rotten it needed to be entirely changed — but kyriarchy is the better word.
I mean reform feminism has benefitted a lot of individual white middle class women in the US but has done very little to change the systems of oppression constructed along race, gender, sexuality, and class.
@Alex,
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! There are too many of us. lol
was that not you? o_O
Man, if what Victoria and ithiliana are talking about is the definition I guess I’m a radical feminist… huh.
@Ithiliana I actually identified as a radical feminist briefly… when I first discovered more advanced anti-oppression stuff and intersectionality as a comic book feminist xD and I felt like it meant I wasn’t just some simple stereotype :\ but then my run ins w/ racist feminists and transphobic feminists made me drop the label :|
@Ithiliana did you see what I said slightly below after Cosmos went thru moderation? xD
Alex–I will happy babble on about the topic–and would love to hear about the class.
I never took a women’s studies course–they didn’t exist in my day (I did get ONE women writer’s course in my undergrad curriculum, along with a Japanese literature in translation and a science fiction class –the women’s and Japanese lit in translation satisfied a “minority studies requirement”). When I stomped out of academia because of telling off the graduate director he was a sexist, I got a clerical job and spent all my extra $ buying women’s literature and feminist books and reading reading reading on my own. Good times, good times. Then when I want back for my doctorate, I did get some theory courses in the English (not women’s studies which is more interdisciplinary usually) department on the critiques of feminisms and gender theory in general.
Unfortunately, I seem to have missed all the meetings where feminists excuse me fymymymists were taking over the country and running things to suit ourselves. What I want to know is how do I get on the mailing list (were my kitties eating the secret feminist message pigeons maybe?)
Ami: I assume you’re spitting as well as trampling–I know that spitting is absolutely necessary.
One of the prejudices I had to work out of that came from my radical feminist reading was against transwomen, all the junk about “women born women” for the Michigan Women’s Music festival. It’s definitely in some strains of radical feminist thought, just as racism is.
The Facts:
Of overall chlamydia diagnoses reported in 2009, the rate of infection among women was almost three times higher than the rate among men: 592.2 cases per 100,000 population compared to a rate of 219.3 among men. This is thought to be due to the higher number of women screened for chlamydia. For gonorrhea, the rate among women was 105.5 (cases per 100,000 population) compared to a rate of 91.9 among men. The rate of primary and secondary stage syphilis was higher among men – 7.8 cases (per 100,000) were reported for men in 2009, compared to 1.4 for women.
Ami: I had to drop the label too! Intersectionality is hard, and coalition politics is harder–but it’s worth doing.
I did see where you listed your sources–is that what you meant? But didn’t see any link or ref from Cosmos? Did you link theirs, and I just didn’t notice?
@AWS:
Dammit AWS, I thought you were going to have something interesting and on topic in the two places you posted this. Ah well, I’ll just repeat what I said in the other thread.
So?
The other thing about Cosmos’ unattributed post (the SCUM Manifesto? Which was from what I understand a very poorly done satire or not supposed to be serious) is that it is the only one. Others have posted multiple examples of MRAs advocating terrible things about or to be done to women and in Peter Nolan’s case, regular officers of the law.
So I think that the two cannot be conflated at all-an example is not a movement or widely held belief.
David can delete from other area.
@Ithiliana Ah Michfest xD yeah that’s still a big thing now -_-
In university (RIGHT before I crashed from my depression and had my first suicide attempt :\ ) I took a 2nd year philosophy course in my first year, Feminist Philosophy, and this was before I “came out” to myself and transitioned, and EVERYBODY was suspicious why I was there xD my instructor didn’t like me v much at first either :\ which was fair, since I also had no clue about feminism or nething at the time.. xD and it’s not like I agreed w/ everyhtiong, I mean that’s one of those myths, that it’s all about agreeing w/ everything and being “brainwashed’ but that’s like saying “Eastern philosophy” is about teaching you to believe in every single thing (or even anything) they teach.. but I rly liked it and I did rly rly well in the course and I was the only one who rly wanted to analyze the Alien movies and we me and her had a great 3 hour talk in her office at the end too :3 I took it cuz it was the thing I knew I knew nothing about, and wanted to.. and as I said I didn’t agree w/ everything (I still dun, tho I understand a LOT of concepts way better) but it was a great course :] and I mean, even if you dun agree, I think it helps to KNOW all sorts of things about different ideas in feminism, and etc, rather than just “know” these things based on common narratives and end up w/ stuff like the trolls here “know” about feminism :\
@AWS:
Still doesn’t help that it has absolutely nothing to do with anything anybody is talking about…
Feminists, dweebs, sadists and 9/11 shills like kirby the nitwit can’t be bothered with facts. On the STD’s rants mgtow is right.
AWS realized that nobody is going to that topic nemore and wants attn here xD
Since it’s here and it’s that time of year… xD Hay AWS what’s your opinion on queer and trans ppl? :3
Kirbywarp: Sorry if I came across too 101!
What is considered radical changs over time–i.e. the extremist ideas of one century are the mainstream reforms of the next.
My mother had to fight in the 1970s to get a credit card account in her own name after the divorce (my father dumped her for graduate student, took the doctorate she worked full time to pay for and his retirement and sailed into the sunset). She also has stories about how during the 1960s and early 70s the wives of graduate students and junior faculty (there were no women grad students or faculty in that field) and the secretaries were in the departments he worked–they had a whole underground network set up to protect each other at parties and other group functions, and to warn the new ones about the men who routinely harassed them (though the concept of sexual harassment did not exist then). The first time a faculty member made a pass at me was at my father’s party (he was Dean) when I was 14 and serving refreshments (this was back when Deans had major parties with lots of booze around–the good old days, NOT).
@AWS:
“Of overall chlamydia diagnoses reported in 2009, the rate of infection among women was almost three times higher than the rate among men: 592.2 cases per 100,000 population compared to a rate of 219.3 among men. This is thought to be due to the higher number of women screened for chlamydia.”
Ok… so it isn’t a trustworthy stat…
“For gonorrhea, the rate among women was 105.5 (cases per 100,000 population) compared to a rate of 91.9 among men.”
Nearly the same.
“The rate of primary and secondary stage syphilis was higher among men – 7.8 cases (per 100,000) were reported for men in 2009, compared to 1.4 for women.”
Men more than women.
So.. what is your point? And how is it even close to not being a derailment?
AWS: This is thought to be due to the higher number of women screened for chlamydia.
So, you know, that’s that.
What does this have to do with anything again?
Elizabeth: OH, was Cosmos’ piece regendering of SCUM ? I haven’t read it in years and didn’t recognize it. I have the original SISTERHOOD anthology in which it appeared–and I think people who think the SCUM piece is a feminst manifesto ought to read the collection to see how many different arguments and takes on feminism were published there.
Since you have the reading skills of a first grader I will walk you through it once kirby the feminist and sadist 9/11 shill.
Women in the USA are STD riddled filthy whores for the most part. Second only to the shills like kirb the nitwit.
@ithilania:
No worries, no arguments here. I’d prefer if each person spoke to their own beliefs, because labels like “feminist” or “mra” or “radfem” or whatever can mean different things to different people. But I know that discourse is difficult if there isn’t an easy way to talk about things. I personally like the “atheist” label to describe myself, and “skeptic” and so on, but I also agree with the normal connotations of those labels (and they are a bit clearer then other labels). So… labels are useful, but can be misused? Take each person by their beliefs instead of by their label?
Ami: from what I have read online, the Michigan Festival seems to have gotten worse over time!
I totally agree–it’s good to read as much as possible about other viewpoints (taking to people is good too, but it’s not as if people always hae time and want to talk, though to be honest, I default to reading anyway). And what totally escapes the MRA dudes is that there is a rag deal of conflict in the “feminist movements” (there are PLURAL, multiple ones)–there are marxist feminists, lesbian separatist feminists, vegan feminists, plus all sorts of other disagreements on theory and practice.
Did you get to write on the Alien movies One of my former students published a book on the series with his wife who is awesome!
Actually I was the one who mentioned the SCUM manifesto xD
http://evebitfirst.wordpress.com/2010/10/07/a-rant/
That’s what Cosmos was using (it’s on the shortlist of what Holly mentioned, that MRAs have this list of urls that they can always bring up to feminists as “see what you feminists believe!?” I’ve seen it many times by now xD)
Men in the USA are STD riddled filthy whores for the most part. Second only to the shills like AWS the nitwit.
That was easy. ;D
@ithiliana i might be rly interested in reading it :D
no I didn’t! I just talked to her constantly every day after class about it until we were finished watching the first 2 movies xD everybody else thought we were nuts xD
Since you have the reading skills of a first grader I will walk you through it once kirbina the masculist and sadist 9/11 shill.
Men in the USA are STD riddled filthy manwhores for the most part. Second only to the shills like kirbina the nitwit.
@AWS:
Those “facts” show that we need better measurements for one STD, the rate of STDs for another is about the same for men and women, and the third shows up more in men than women. Basically, the reliable stats you’ve cited show that men are more “disease ridden.”
And seriously, me? An STD riddled filthy whore? But I’m clean! And I haven’t had sex in months! And I’ve only been having sex for a couple years! And and and… Oh wait, you’re just being insulting, aren’t you. Aww… *pats AWS’s head*
*smacks AWS’s nose* Bad. No insulting without any grounds. Bad.
Aw, beat to the punch.
So I have just one question: Where do you think heterosexual women would get STDs from?
XDDD
Kirbiina!
@Holly:
Don’t you know? When women have sex, but don’t get pregnant, they instead start sprouting STDs! Then they pass them off to poor men who have sex with them later! STDs are created by women not getting pregnant!
Sisterhood is Powerful, edited by Robn Morgan, 1970
Considered the first major work of “modern” feminsm–I’d say, specifically radical feminism got its start here.
602 pages, and it’s not just the SCUM Manifesto.
Sisterhood Is Powerful
http://books.google.com/books/about/Sisterhood_is_powerful.html?id=2v61AAAAIAAJ
http://stdtesting.md/blog/stds-across-america-32
Kirby the dirty feminist 9/11 shill has no research skills.
ami: Thanks for doing what I meant to do (and I need to go and edit the parent post to make the link work again, I got it from an Edmonton paper, and their link is dead).
[NOTE FROM DF: I DELETED SOME OTHER STUFF HERE]
@ithiliana oh! talking about that… did you know I’m actually in a book? xD
here! xD
somebody wrote a feminist essay (that’s in a book of collection of essays) about “fangirl” bloggers and femininity in comics fandom and I’m there xD
@AWS:
Ok… so your link has graphs depicting the distribution of different STDs amongst each gender. The bubble for females is twice as big as the one for males. But that seeems to be just the number of people in the study. The link says nothing about how many STD cases there are overall for each gender. Do you have stats on number of STD cases per gender specifically?
@Ami,
No, that wasn’t me. lol Apparently we now have another Alex on Man Boobz…I knew I should have gone by my pseudonym, but it’s just…I don’t think I can handle actually being called Cassandra! Let alone *shudder* Cassie or Cass! And no one’s called me Alexandra since I was eleven! Al’s too close to Mr. Al (no offense), and Allie, well, only one person was ever allowed to call me that…And I do not, under any circumstances, go by Lexi or Alexandria! *sigh* Oh well, I guess Alex 2 and I will have to figure which one someone is talking to when they address Alex. -_-
Ithiliana, I guessed it was because it is, quite literally, the only time a feminist has said anything close to what the MRAs say on a regular basis. The other thing of note is the fact that it was written a very long time ago while the MRA examples are all of recent origin. Apparently the feminist movement has not changed at all or is not allowed to change cuz then that kind of trashes the whole “you are just like them!” Meme that Cosmos has.
@Pecunium i dunno if something got cut out of your post :\ but yeah.. I didn’t know that actually happened! :O (did the Spearhead guy base it off of that? or was it a coincidence? o: ) but the result is basically what I said would happen in my post about this xD The police would NOT JUST GIVE UP and let DV be de facto legal… they would go after the guy… and if MRAs were plotting to do this as a group, and trying to, I dun think the police would just leave them alone or that they’d be regarded as a quaint philosophy nemore :\ I’m pretty sure if they started trying to kill police officers, they’d be labelled a domestic terrorist group and the feminist conspiracy would be the least of their problems -_-;;
Alex, how about Xela?
But she’s the first Alex (I think?) she should still be Alex >:|
*points gun at one, then the other*
I.. I can’t tell which one was the original! Quick, Alex, say something only the real Alex would say!