The Regender Challenge
The other day Darksidecat introduced me to what I now consider to be the Greatest Webpage Ever (this week): Regender, a handy tool that will take any web page and, well, regender it, turning male pronouns and references into female and vice versa. It even works with names.
Following Darksidecat’s lead, I have started plugging the writings of some of my favorite manosphere misogynists into the magical regendering machine. The results are, well, instructive. And frequently hilarious. As DSC noted, Roissy and MarkyMark are perfect for this sort of treatment. As is, I discovered, MarkyMark’s longtime pal Christopher in Oregon. Here’s what happens when Christopher of Oregon becomes Christine of Oregon with the help of regender, and all the horrible shit he wrote about women becomes the horrible shit she wrote about men:
Men are whores. They are far more likely to have STD’s than women. Be aware of this. Handle with extreme care. Men are filthy, and they will lie about their infections. Condoms will NOT protect you. …
Men are walking cesspools of filth! Most of them have or will have a permanent STD infection. It is unavoidable. These are FACTS, and not the rantings of an unstable misandrist.
(I’m a very STABLE misandrist, thank you kindly)
Men are DIRTY creatures, pure and simple. Be dignified, and don’t lower yourself to engaging in any filthy behavior with them. You WILL be infected with the diseases they are carrying. A moral, dignified woman does NOT rut like an animal with one of these creatures. Sexual intercourse and oral sex are filthy, disgusting activities, and ruin a woman morally. They spread disease.
Elevate yourself above such filth of the flesh. …
Do not lust after men in your mind. Masturbate only as a last result to relieve tension. Do not lust after men sexually. It weakens you.
Goddess made woman in Her image, and men was made in the image of Satan. Squeal all you want, but history proves me right. A man is a test; a stumbling block for woman. Our life is an adventure. A journey. A pursuit of our creator, and a pursuit of excellence in our personal lives. A man and his filth is part of the obstacle course set before us. If we are wise, and avoid them, we will grow stronger as a result. We will finish the race successfully.
Men was not put here to support us as such, and we will only grow stronger if we AVOID his snares. ..
Christine in Oregon
Woah. Critics of Man Boobz often say that feminists are “just as bad” as the guys I quote. Well, if they were, the posts on their blogs would look a lot like this regendered post. I ask all of you: have you ever seen something so grotesquely misandrist on any feminist web site? I thought not.
Here’s a challenge for all of you: See if you can come up with a regendered post that tops this one from “Christine in Oregon.” You can draw from old posts of mine, or go poking about in the manosphere yourself. Post your results in the thread below, along with a link to the regendered web page you got them from. I’ll highlight the best in a future post.
Posted on July 2, 2011, in men who should not ever be with women ever, MGTOW, MGTOW paradox, misandry, misogyny, MRA, precious bodily fluids, sex. Bookmark the permalink. 1,138 Comments.
NWOslave | July 2, 2011 at 8:35 pm
Is that ALL it says Ozzy? Withholding anything? A lie of ommision is still a lie.
What do you believe she is omitting? What do you believe SHE believes? xD
Here’s a comment from one of your own Ozzy, Doctress Julia… “Gods, you know?? I feel sick, and I am crying. I’ve had a tough week, I feel sick already and this FUCKING TURD might get away with this?
I am really terrified and fucking enraged at the direction we are going in. When will we make this shit end? When will we MAKE these fucking animals stop hurting women?”
http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2011/07/01/there-are-no-perfect-accusers/#comments
This woman is a fucking liar. The guy didn’t rape her. This woman has already falsely accused another man. And you fucks can’t even admit the guy isn’t guilty. And even the one’s in you faction that admit he’s not guilty are still extatic he’s lost his job. And the woman that replaced him, oh what a jewel she is. She basically called men shit.
Also Kirby, he’s ttlly ignored you on how you broke his logic for the idea of “punishment should fit the punishment of the accused crime” thing xD
Thank the goddess the grammar nazi is here to further my education.
sarahejones, I have literally never heard the distinction between radical feminist and radfem before. The latter is merely a shorthand version of the former. So if it indeed a widespread thing that people use the terms to mean different things, then it is news to me.
I’d be happy to discuss my views on radical feminism in more depth as a radfem in a heterosexual relationship, but I’m not sure that this is the place. If you leave some contact info I could message you privately.
Are you upset by having your grammar corrected? o_O He’s corrected others and I haven’t seen nebody react the way you have o_O
XD
Neways… so aside from your weird phasing in and out… so what’s your point? :] You’re being vague again… you believe that feminism is [ ] and therefore [ ] and that we as individual feminists should [ ] etc etc
it’s like madlibs! xD
what would you like Ozymandias to do? o: What do you believe she actually believes, and why do you believe she’s lying to you?
@Fuck MRAs:
I’d be interested in hearing about it too. Why not take it to the open thread? Its kinda the whole point of having one. :P
@NWO:
Still waiting on that quote, buddy. Amazing how you have to go on the offensive against posters to avoid having to answer for your own shit.
I’m glad NWO is reading me again xD It means I can ask him to clarify stuff :3
@Kirby I know right xD it’s so obv when he can’t answer something, he attacks some random person he’s been ignoring xD
@Fuck MRAs
The distinction is, a radical feminist lobbys to get the laws passes that disenfranchises men. A radfem supports the above. Your standard feminist yammers endlessly how all feminist’s aren’t like that. And all women garnish the perks and pick and choose which tasty fruit to munch on.
Does that clarify things for ya?
Yea Kirby, I’m waiting as well.
@NWO:
You’ve been answered multiple times. And we asked first. You turned the question around to avoid having to answer us. Well, we’ve given you at least two answers now, so provide your quote.
Your mom munches on tasty fruit.
Wow he’s rly flailing now xD
The distinction is, a radical feminist lobbys to get the laws passes that disenfranchises men. A radfem supports the above. Your standard feminist yammers endlessly how all feminist’s aren’t like that. And all women garnish the perks and pick and choose which tasty fruit to munch on.
Elaborate, use specific examples and specific feminists, (preferably the ones here)…
which laws are we personally lobbying to get passed that disenfranchise men? And where have we personally supported these laws? :D We want to know your worldview :]
It doesn’t seem like you received any education worth a damn.
You write far below the 6th grade level (that’s being more than generous), your reasoning and logic skills are dismal, and with the way you handle criticism, I’d hate to see what you said to teachers when they gave you your marks.
Well I even asked NWO a non specific question
I`ll ask again :3
NWO: You DO have the quote and source for feminists saying “all women are perfect” right? :]
*yawn*
Anyhow,
kirby, I’m honestly sure if it’s something I am interested in getting into on any kind of in-depth basis here at manboobz. I’ll think about it, and if not here, then maybe I can type something up to send out individually to people who are interested.
NWO, do you believe you have changed any minds since you started posting here? :]
Unless you are, in fact, God, I would suggest putting an “h” at the end of “yea”.
@Fuck MRAs:
Mk then, it’s your call.
@Sperhafoc:
I can imagine NWO in class.
Teacher: “It’s been about 3 weeks since your essay was due. Are you planning on turning it in?”
NWO: “I’ve asked for an essay from you as well, and I haven’t received one yet. I do all this homework, but you do none of mine.”
Oh also! Why do you believe that the feminists here always tell you that feminism is not this conspiracy thing that you say it is and believe it to be? :] Do you believe we KNOW already and are lying? or that we’re naive and have no idea the sekrit truth behind our beliefs? o_O And if the beliefs we tell you are feminism and practice ourselves and believe are NOT this sekrit truth, why does it matter?
You seem v angry but I dunno why or what you see when you look at the world :\ If you tell us it could help! :D
He must have had a good nap :3
Hey FMRA, do you have facebook or something? :]
Kirby should repeat what NWO’s logic of crime accusations should look like xD
To elaborate a bit, I am not a blogger and honestly…This is the most I have commented on the same blog since well, the word blog was invented. I am more of a reader, very occasional commenter, and thumbs-upper. So the problem here, for me, is twofold:
1. It’s a bit intimidating, almost like being asked to be a public speaker. I don’t necessarily do so well with that, especially since I would feel some pressure as some sort of unelected speaker for the radical feminist movement.
2. I’m not sure I am practiced enough with this sort of thing to do it justice. I always tend to find someone else who says what I wanted to say better than I could.
So we’ll see.
FMRAs if you want, we can work on a post together and put it up as a guest post on my blog :] That way I can take the heat if things go pear-shaped :3
Kirby, I have answered. Never being wrong is equal to being perfect. The pathetic attempts at proving your admittance of being wrong is childlike.
Snowy, my mom is dead. Ya know the “rule” among men is ya don’t say anything about a man’s mother.
Ami, lobbied for by women.
Abortion = men ahve no rights to a live child.
No fault divorce = a man can be kicked out of the family.
AA, Quota’s = women get jobs, opportunites, ect. because of their gender.
Title IX = education bennies, plus now it’s also it’s own police force, judge, jury and executioner. After the jury has read, “why men are controlling.”
There are over 60 million “laws,” Pick one it’ll place women above men. Less time for crimes, employment, education, ect. You want it you got it. Wait, citation needed. Suddenly everyone here is clueless.
@Ami: hee, all right. Here it is in strict syllogism form.
1. All false accusations of a crime should have the same punishment as the crime itself.
2. The punishment for rape is X.
3. The punishment for false accusation of rape should be X. (1 and 2)
4. False accusation of rape is a crime.
5. The false accusation of making a false rape accusation should have the same punishment as making a false accusation. (1 and 4)
6. The punishment for making a false accusation of making a false rape accusation should be X. (3 and 5)
It really is a pretty terrible way to construct a legal system. Especially when you consider that “false accusations” are sometimes conflated with misidentification (which is later corrected), or the court simply not having enough evidence to prove a guilty conviction (not the same as proving innocence).
Oh really, is that the rule? I guess I must not have gotten the memo.
Still waiting on that quote.
@NWO:
You have never provided a quote from a feminist that says “All women are perfect.” And you are the only person on this blog who thinks we are never wrong. So you haven’t answered squat. Provide the quote, and stop squirming.
He seems… v … unglued xD
ok so it’s the 3 things he always rails about which he disagrees w/ ppl here about their implementation and/or what they ARE xD
but at least we know something :3 (tho rly we haven’t learned nething new…)
ok let’s pick one…
Abortion
NWO you believe abortion is murder correct? so when a person says that it’s not, you believe they should admit to you that they are wrong ? correct? :]
Unglued is putting it mildly.
Still waiting for someone to admit they’re wrong Snowy. Etiquette, by the way. Insulting someones family is a no-no.
ami, I do not have a facebook. I had an online stalker when I was a teenager and I have always been very wary of putting any kind of real info about myself on the net ever since. I had a myspace page under a fake name for a while when that was big, but I canceled that long ago.
any IMs? :]
if you want you can leave an email on my blog (comments are filtered) and I’ll get to you :] if you want :] i understand not wanting to :3
Already gave you an example of someone doing just that, Mr Slave. When did I insult anyone’s family?
@NWO:
Do I really have to say this again? We asked for something first. You made a claim, we want your evidence of it. You turning around and saying “Well, I’m not gonna answer until you answer MY question” is the height of childishness. Especially when we do answer your question, but you don’t like the response.
hmm… ami, that could work. I don’t so much mind taking heat, I just don’t want to do radical feminism a disservice.
@NWO who do you believe on this blog is wrong? and specifically what are they wrong about and why? :) you seem to believe ppl should admit they’re wrong.. but that means you believe they have been wrong about something (unless you think ppl should admit they’re wrong when they’re not)
also you seem to not believe ppl are admitting they’re wrong when they ARE xD
so you tell us :] name a person here who has been wrong about something, make your case, see if they apologize :3
@ Snowy
“Your mom munches on tasty fruit.”
Unless of course you meant that in the nicest way?
@ FMRAs:
If you want, I can also collab with you; though I don’t know how many issues we may/may not agree on – like I said, my interpretation of radical feminism is the belief that our entire culture needs to change past the point of recognizability in order for all inequalities to be adequately addressed. If you get in contact with Ami, I can get in contact with you thru her and we can maybe set up a shared Google doc or something.
EVERY law favors women?
Like, traffic law? Animal control law? Laws regulating proper lighting on boats over 20 feet after dark in open water?
you should admit you were wrong about that snowy and apologize xD
(or does that not count too NWO? xD )
I’ve heard far too many “Yo Mamma” jokes to believe that’s an actual rule.
Neither do women.
Or, a woman can be kicked out of the family. Men divorce women too.
Quotas! No apostrophe.
Quotas are a little too complex and nuanced for your little brain to comprehend. The long and short of it is, there is an asymmetry in the jobs/positions that are given. Men get preference from employers because women are often seen as inferior. Quotas are to correct that.
If men aren’t given any opportunities, why the disparity between male and female CEOs?
Yes, Title IX has the ability to execute people. You got me there.
@ Slavey:
Show me a post Dave, where anyone here has ever admitted being wrong debating me. As I’m told constantly, I’m always wrong.
There’s a difference between ‘women are always right’ and ‘NWOslave is never right.’ I’ve mad a couple mistakes here, and quite a few many more in real life. So has every woman I know.
@Pervocracy women don’t use boats, we make men use them, so the laws only restrict men.
Also girl animals (like cats) are protected while boy animals (like moose) don’t get to be pets and can be shot.
Traffic law isn’t fair cuz women drivers aren’t sanctioned harder or have more laws applied to them even tho they’re WAY WAY WAY worse drivers… so in that case, fairness is inequality.
@Victoria Von Syrus except me xD
@Ami… That’s one of the few time’s, if ever you’ve actually addressed me. Normally you talk about me and expect me to answer. I’m guessing that reinforces your narcissistic superiority.
The wrongs that none of you admit to is the “laws” that feminists/women have imposed upon men.
@NWO:
You don’t… you don’t read Ami’s posts at all, do you…
“And all women garnish the perks and pick and choose which tasty fruit to munch on.”
I assume your mom is a woman, therefore, from your own mouth Mr Slave.
Oh wait! Ami, you’re right! Sorry Mr Slave! Hey look, I just apologized! So yeah, just waiting on you here. Just waiting around for that quote that I’m sure you have.
I talk to you all the time, you never answer xD BUT since you brought it up :D So from now on when I DO address you you WILL answer? xD 100%? :3
And yus it reinforced my narcissistic superiority xD
The wrongs that none of you admit to is the “laws” that feminists/women have imposed upon men.
What specifically? You’re being vague again o_O
which ppl have not “admitted” what have they not admitted to? :3
ok so I’m going to test this :3 Since he’s never upheld this before xD But we’ll find out if he’s changed xD
When I talk to YOU, you should respond right NWO? :3
When I talk about HIM, he should not respond to that at all right?
Is there agreement? (who did I address? xD )
Pigman has a funny regendered quote:
“Rather than the caring, other-focused creatures of masculist propaganda, what men really are is a pack of money-hoarding, chocolate-grubbing cows who don’t phone their old folks as often as the [ladies], ignore the homeless and allow the frail and elderly to struggle with heavy shopping bags lest they spoil their makeup by breaking a sweat! The Caring and Compassionate Sex is also more likely to bitch about their friends behind their backs, more likely to forget birthdays (not their own, of course) and more likely to deliberately run over small children!”
Here’s a regender boycottamericanwomen one:
“I’m pretty sure most american women don’t want a slave. With the divorce rate so high, most women are doing it all for themselves anyway. You can ride through my neighborhood
, and the women are either working in their yards, or working in their shops repairing things. They cook and clean for themselves, and some are single mothers with kids. The problem is, American men DO NOT want a good woman. To them a good woman just is not attractive. The bad girls seem to get all the action. A GOOD woman will catch her husband banging her best friend. A GOOD woman is weak in a womans eyes. An asshole gets all the ass, while a good woman…….. well, she just gets f##ked. ”
@Fuck MRAs
Radical feminist, radfem, your standard run of the mill feminist. It really doesn’t matter, they’re all the same. They each cry out for Big Daddy to hand over some perk or power, then claim we’re not a monolithic block while garnishing the entitlements of each other.
I just realized he said “if ever”
xD
rly? he’s unsure if I’ve EVER addressed him? xD
Oh I mean…
you’re unsure if I’ve EVER addressed you? xD
I wonder if he realizes that I actually agree with him on Title IX :o
hey NWO you’re ttlly wrong on Title IX! >:O
ARGH!
Where the frell did you go to school?
To be honest Ami, I find you to be the vilest of all the creatures that dwell here. You’d trample a million men to come to the aid of some transperson who had their feelings hurt. Oh and the only reason I actually use the term “transperson” is because Dave will pull out the speech police card if I don’t. Does that clarify what I think of people like you?
Tool Academy?
Title IX actually is the reason more Canadian universities can’t join the NCAA, b/c we don’t have the equal funding legislation.
@NWO:
Well, there are two ways this can go, since I’m getting tired of spamming this thread with attempts to get you to be honest in this discussion. Either you provide evidence of your claim, or you set a precedent for all future conversations with you, where we may ignore any question you have as long as we can somehow flip the question back over to you, and then we are justified in rejecting any answer you provide if we don’t like it.
This is your last chance from me, pal. Provide a quote, or condemn all future conversations with you. (And if you say “I’ve already answered you, by saying you all think you are never wrong, and are therefore perfect” thats a) not a quote, and b) wrong on its premise. So don’t bother with that one.)
Oh, come on! I’m surely more vile than she!
I round up millions of people to be gassed for the mere crime of improper punctuation!
NWOslave | July 2, 2011 at 9:25 pm
To be honest Ami, I find you to be the vilest of all the creatures that dwell here. You’d trample a million men to come to the aid of some transperson who had their feelings hurt. Oh and the only reason I actually use the term “transperson” is because Dave will pull out the speech police card if I don’t. Does that clarify what I think of people like you?
YES xD I always figured he hated me the most xD
Now to get more details! :D
You’d trample a million men to come to the aid of some transperson who had their feelings hurt.
Like how? :D Literally trample? Am I trampling them right now? xD What do you mean “feelings hurt”? :3
Does that clarify what I think of people like you?
What are ppl like me? o: What other ppl, specifically, are examples of ppl like me?
ALSO!
Oh and the only reason I actually use the term “transperson” is because Dave will pull out the speech police card if I don’t
I dun think David will restrict your speech for this particular moment, cuz I’m asking you for this…
what’s the word you wanted to say? :3 don’t hide behind fear of censorship, say it xD
Okay so that’s… cruel… nasty… um.. evil (in general, NWO’s called us evil) and now I’m VILE xD
what other synonyms do I need to collect? o_O
@kirbywarp, condemn all future conversations with me? You’re kidding right? What you’ll disagree with everything I say from now own. I don’t know if I can live with that. It seems once again everyone of you are right again. Weird, huh?
There ya go. I admit it. Everyone one of you is right and I’m wrong. Too damn funny. I’m hoping you all see the paradox.
Oo, oo, can I be “villainous”?
So… Holly, Ozy, Julia, even David, are all more redeeming than me? xD I’m the WORST here? :D Like the worst worst? x3
@NWO:
Still waiting for your quote, and for you to stop squirming. You could always say “I don’t know of a quote, and until I find one, I’ll drop the ‘feminists think women are perfect’ thing.” That’d be a perfectly valid response, and you don’t even necessarily have to admit you are wrong!
Also, “I always lie” or “I’m always wrong” isn’t a paradox. That statement might be a lie/wrong, but the negation is “I’m not always wrong” which even for you is true.