The Regender Challenge
The other day Darksidecat introduced me to what I now consider to be the Greatest Webpage Ever (this week): Regender, a handy tool that will take any web page and, well, regender it, turning male pronouns and references into female and vice versa. It even works with names.
Following Darksidecat’s lead, I have started plugging the writings of some of my favorite manosphere misogynists into the magical regendering machine. The results are, well, instructive. And frequently hilarious. As DSC noted, Roissy and MarkyMark are perfect for this sort of treatment. As is, I discovered, MarkyMark’s longtime pal Christopher in Oregon. Here’s what happens when Christopher of Oregon becomes Christine of Oregon with the help of regender, and all the horrible shit he wrote about women becomes the horrible shit she wrote about men:
Men are whores. They are far more likely to have STD’s than women. Be aware of this. Handle with extreme care. Men are filthy, and they will lie about their infections. Condoms will NOT protect you. …
Men are walking cesspools of filth! Most of them have or will have a permanent STD infection. It is unavoidable. These are FACTS, and not the rantings of an unstable misandrist.
(I’m a very STABLE misandrist, thank you kindly)
Men are DIRTY creatures, pure and simple. Be dignified, and don’t lower yourself to engaging in any filthy behavior with them. You WILL be infected with the diseases they are carrying. A moral, dignified woman does NOT rut like an animal with one of these creatures. Sexual intercourse and oral sex are filthy, disgusting activities, and ruin a woman morally. They spread disease.
Elevate yourself above such filth of the flesh. …
Do not lust after men in your mind. Masturbate only as a last result to relieve tension. Do not lust after men sexually. It weakens you.
Goddess made woman in Her image, and men was made in the image of Satan. Squeal all you want, but history proves me right. A man is a test; a stumbling block for woman. Our life is an adventure. A journey. A pursuit of our creator, and a pursuit of excellence in our personal lives. A man and his filth is part of the obstacle course set before us. If we are wise, and avoid them, we will grow stronger as a result. We will finish the race successfully.
Men was not put here to support us as such, and we will only grow stronger if we AVOID his snares. ..
Christine in Oregon
Woah. Critics of Man Boobz often say that feminists are “just as bad” as the guys I quote. Well, if they were, the posts on their blogs would look a lot like this regendered post. I ask all of you: have you ever seen something so grotesquely misandrist on any feminist web site? I thought not.
Here’s a challenge for all of you: See if you can come up with a regendered post that tops this one from “Christine in Oregon.” You can draw from old posts of mine, or go poking about in the manosphere yourself. Post your results in the thread below, along with a link to the regendered web page you got them from. I’ll highlight the best in a future post.
Posted on July 2, 2011, in men who should not ever be with women ever, MGTOW, MGTOW paradox, misandry, misogyny, MRA, precious bodily fluids, sex. Bookmark the permalink. 1,138 Comments.
Well, let’s see, if being pregnant is like taking a shit, and Omegas get shit on, then that means . . .
OMG! Omega men are getting knocked up by Alpha bitches!
THIS CHANGES EVERYTHING!!!!
http://www.examiner.com/domestic-violence-in-national/new-campaign-launched-on-international-men-s-day-for-male-victims-of-family-violence-and-abuse
And it’s not only in Scotland!
Did you know that in Australia…
• Up to one in three victims of sexual assault is male?
• At least one in three victims of family violence is male?
• 435,000 Australian men have experienced violence from a current or previous partner?
A groundbreaking Dutch scheme has recently established shelters for abused men in four major cities.
In Ireland, Amen provides a confidential helpline, support service and information for male victims of domestic abuse.
In the UK, the Next Steps Housing Association has recently created 100 places in 35 refuge houses for husbands and partners of abusive women.
Confidential helplines for men have also been established in England and Wales.
Johnny Pez – I’m gay? That’s really inconvenient.
Luke123 – thanks, you made my day with that “You were lucky”. Because I felt lucky to get out of there having had only a pleasant meal and some conversation. It was unreal.
@Johnny,
LOL!!!
Luke123, have you ever had dinner with some women? What was your experience like?
All I can say is that if NWO really thinks giving birth is no worse than taking a shit, then he seriously needs more fiber in his diet.
@Alex, if I get hit in the balls accidentally I’m going to be in a world of pain. Praise me for extra that I’ve given. Oh thats right, it’s a biological function. Hey I had a cold a while back. Damn, I sure did give extra in the way of biological functions.
To give something extra, you have to actually do something more than exist while a biological function is taking place. Reguardless if that function is unpleasant.
I stand corrected: NWOsilly does not like it rough. He likes it roughage.
Have you ever had dinner with a woman, NWO?
I’m starting to feel like the slaveman needs a nappy-poo. Not that he was making a helluvalotof sense before, but the quality of his argument has gone way downhill. Which is pretty impressive, considering.
If pregnancy is, ER, stealing a man’s sperm, shouldn’t women be not just allowed but required to abort if the guy disappears? And shouldn’t it be allowed if the guy consents?
(Not that I support this. But to follow him down the Crazy Brick Road.)
No Graham, I never have.
If you’re going to ask stupid questions I’ll have to assume you want stupid reply’s.
Luke123: Ah.. an someone with numbers in his handle proves to be innumerate:
We have never said men aren’t victims, what we have said is that women are the most common victims
# In 2008-09, the highest rate of incidents of domestic abuse per 100,000 population among ffemale victims</b. was for those aged 22 to 25 years, where the rate was 4,920 incidents per 100,000 population.
# Among male victims, the highest rate of incidents of domestic abuse per 100,000 population was for those aged 26 to 30 years, where the rate was 753 incidents per 100,000 population. This has changed from 2007-08 where males aged 31 to 35 who were seeing the highest incident rates (667).
So the rate of female victims (in the largest, but not total classes) is about 500 percent higher.
Looking at Statistcal Bulletin on Violent Crimes for Scotland the article (written by a woman) was based on…
What was your point? We see that the absolute number of male victims has gone up, but the rate of male on female violence has stayed the same, which means more men are also committing abuse.
I didn’t realise it was a stupid question. :( I’m sorry, NWO, I didn’t mean to hurt you.
@Mr. Slave,
No, I’m not talking about being kicked (that’s called assault, not a bodily function), or getting sick. For a foetus to be born a female will ALWAYS have to be pregnant. No one HAS to be sick or get kicked in the balls to make a baby get born. I’m asking does a male human contributes an extra bodily function to a foetus, the same way a female human does? A female human contributes an egg and the “bodily function” of pregnancy. What bodily function does a male human contribute besides a sperm?
NWOsilly, stalking a woman while she’s having a meal does not count as having dinner with her.
“No Graham, I never have.”
Honesty isn’t stupid, slaveman. It’s okay. We already knew that about you.
@Graham
I had dinner with a feminist once. I made a bologna sandwich of here. But it tasted too bitter.
So I fed the rest to the cat, who didn’t want it either.
Wait, is Luke Wuntuthri admitting that he killed and ate a woman? That’s a pretty bold admission, even for an MRA.
Marc: Psychological… harm… doesn’t… count?
FUCK YOU AND THE HORSE YOU RODE IN ON.
Yes it doesn’t count.
There are abundant examples where you can inflict enormous psychological damage on someone. Few of them are punishable (like defamation). And not a single one of them is punished as severe as rape.
QFT. Marc, if you believe that, you have also forfeited the right to be taken seriously.
Why? I never said, rape shouldn’t be punished. Of couse it’s bad and you shouldn’t do it. But it definitively should be punished much less than blinding someone or beating them to a pulp. You just can’t lock somebody up for a decade for rape.
Should people who engage in bullying to the point of causing real harm be punished? Yes. Is it practical (i.e. is can we show a causal link, and move from there to make a charge; such as second degree murder)? Not really.
It’s really not about if rape should be punished. It’s only about “how severe?”.
But let’s extend you analogy. You say that merely having sex with someone against their will isn’t a harm (vagaina’s were meant to have penes put into them from time to time: which is an Aristotlean argument for the telologic purpose of genitals, but I digress), and so no actual harm was done.
There is no clear forensic method to distinguish rape from consensual heterosexual intercourse, so it is absolutely possible to rape someone without causing objectively observable bodily harm.
So, if I defraud Warren Buffet, or Mark Zuckerbrg, or Bill Gates out of… oh, lets say, one million dollars, or the Federal Gov’t, of a couple of hundred million, it ought to be about as big a deal a speeding ticket, right? They can afford it, after all, I’ve not done any real “harm”.
No.
Psychological harm is subjective and extremely difficult to measure. It’s interesting enough that Captain Bathrobe question was about gay rape (and he presumes that I’m straight) instead of an example of a woman forcing a man to have sex with her (nobody would assume real psychological harm there). That really says a hell of a lot. He’s the one who forfeited the right to be taken seriously, not me.
And your argument is a strawman. Of course there’s real harm for Bill Gates if he loses a few million, financial harm, he really lost the money. You can check his account and there really, objectively is less money because of the fraudster. Maybe he doesn’t care and there’s no psychological harm or there at least shouldn’t be much psychological harm. But that’s no problem for me because I cannot value psychological harm that much anyway.
So your examples support my position not yours.
So, you can have your, “natural” law, and live in a place where revenge is more likely, or you can live under the rule of law.. and be denied the ability to rape with legal repercussion.
That’s a totally different argument. First I don’t have the desire to rape anybody and I don’t want to make rape “legal”. Also it’s not possible to opt out of the law.
The point is: I would (until someone gives me a cogent argument why rape without bodily harm is more serious than bullying someone into suicide) support a reduction of the punishment for rape. I think rape is overrated as a crime.
@pervocracy
The question was quite simple, but I’ll try again.
Here’s the scenario. A man and a woman both consent to sex. The sex was agreed upon by them both, however in no way did the man consent to his reproductive capability. Conception takes place. Does the woman have carte blanche over his reproductive material of which they both contributed equally?
Pecunium – I think Luke123’s point was that the number of male DV victims is rising and so the evil feminazi government is doing something about it, because they hate men?
Marc, the silkscreen place called. Your DECRIMINALIZE RAPE tee-shirt is ready.
NWO: So… the law says assault did take place. Here, I’ll quote it, again:
240. An assault is an unlawful attempt, coupled with a present ability, to commit a violent injury on the person of another.
and the jury instructions:
@Mr. Slave,
Slave man, Slave man, *ahem* Does a male human contributes an extra bodily function to a foetus, the same way a female human does? A female human contributes an egg and the “bodily function” of pregnancy. What bodily function does a male human contribute besides a sperm?
Crap… blockquote fail.
re reproduction: Pregnancy is a foreseeable consequence of sex, just as getting cut/burned while working in a kitchen is a foreseeable consequence. No special protections, other than a reasobable diligence on my part is required in either case.
If a woman (or man) actively misrepresents her/his status as infertile, then it is arguable that a financial obligation could be avoided, but absent a provable act of malice, fucking can lead to pregnancy, and he knew the risks when he stuck it in.
You know, it occurs to me that you are correct when you say you should be thanking us… this sort of private tutoring in ethics, law, arithmetic, history, philosophy; and even religion, would be very expensive if you had to pay for it.
Um . . .
So . . . the man has to agree beforehand to allow his sperm to impregnate the woman, or it doesn’t count?
You’re right, Bee. This is just gibberish.
@Pecunium
Do you think that women should be allowed abuse back in retaliation, and advocate for special treatment in court to forgive them if they do ?
Because that is what the feminist organization Praxis is doing.
NWO – By your logic, she would HAVE to abort.
By mine, she’s the landlord of her uterus and can keep or evict the tenant as she sees fit.
Also, if you don’t consent to “use of your reproductive capability,” keep your capability under latex.
Luke123:
“I had dinner with a feminist once. I made a bologna sandwich of here. But it tasted too bitter.”
I see what you did there: You tried to make a joke, but it didn’t work. What you should have said is:
“I had a feminist for dinner once. In a sandwich, but it tasted too bitter.”
Because the joke is in the double meaning of “having someone for dinner”. If you say you “had dinner with someone”, there is no double meaning, so the rest of your witticism is redundant.
Honestly, this is basic stuff, Luke.
@Pecunium
No violent injury has taken place. A pregnancy was aborted. There was no injury. None. Zero pain was inflicted. She was asleep while the 1 week old fetus was aborted. She didn’t know it happened. The doc had to tell her she was no longer pregnant. The BF/hunsband told her he used X material to accomplish the abortion. She never felt it or knew.
Is that clear enough?
Holly, you seem to understand what Silly is saying. Can you explain it to me?
@Mr. Slave,
SLAVE MAN!
Does or doesn’t a male human contributes an extra bodily function to a foetus, the same way a female human does? A female human contributes two, the egg, and the pregnancy. What bodily function does a male human contribute besides a sperm?
@pervocracy
If a woman doesn’t consent she can also keep it under wraps. Unless a woman isn’t held accountable? Is that the case?
Actually, Marc, I would argue that a woman raping a man is just as harmful as a man raping a woman. Also being anally raped is equally bad whether the victim is straight or gay. Non-consensual sex is and should be a serious crime. I’m glad I live in a society where that is the case–in theory if not always in practice. If that means you don’t take me seriously, well, I won’t lose any sleep over it.
Marc, I suppose in your world child molestation shouldn’t be a serious crime, either?
Not to change the subject here or anything — wait, what is the subject? — but I wanted to repost something that I posted when NWO was away sleeping or working like a dog or giving birth to a poo or whatever it is that he was doing:
Last night I watched a vampire movie (Thirst, 2009), in which the lady vampire was a lot more evil than the man vampire. And the least sympathetic character in the movie was another woman. And yet I loved the movie!
At one point I actively found myself rooting for the man vampire to kill the lady vampire!
Does that make me a bad feminist? Or does it make me a feminist who thinks that female characters in films should be as complicated and flawed as male characters — just like in real life — and that female characters in movies should run the gamut from good to evil just like male characters? And that sometimes this means movies in which the female characters are worse people (or vampires) than the male characters, and that this is perfectly fine and good?
Gosh, it’s almost as if my kind of feminism is sort of premised on the notion that women are NOT perfect princesses, but, you know, are human beings with good points and bad points just like men?
Marc: So your examples support my position not yours.
No, because you are saying the “harm” of rape is minor. I am also saying the “Harm” of taking a fraction of one percent (and a really small fraction, at that) shouldn’t be punished the same as taking a car from someone who only has one car.
So it’s not a strawman, it’s an analogy.
That you then make the same sort of teleological argument about “gay rape” is why we say you aren’t being consistent. It’s not like it’s real harm to have a cock shoved up your ass, or be made to give a blowjob. It’s not like someone blinded you.
The point is: I would (until someone gives me a cogent argument why rape without bodily harm is more serious than bullying someone into suicide)
But you discounted mine: 1: I agreed with you, bullying someone to suicide is at least as criminal as rape. I also said that problems of causal proof are harder, and the means of testing it aren’t present.
But the real fact is… you are are rape apologist. You want to make anything which doesn’t have a woman beaten = “not rape”. No one is going to be able to make what you consider a, “cogent argument” because you are arguing in bad faith, equivocating, question begging and moving goalposts.
So, go play with whatever it is you play with when you aren’t campainging in favor of rape while pretending to argue about the best way to punish it.
(That last comment of mine was mostly directed at NWO.)
Mangina, David. It makes you a bad mangina.
NWO: Injury is not a legal requirement for assault. Is that clear enough?
If I point a pistol at you, or pull a knife on you, that’s all I have to do to be convicted of Assault with a Deadly Weapon.
Go on, read the statutes I quoted, they are right there. It’s very short. You can do it. I know you can.
@Alex
If you believe you can create life from nothing than do so. Otherwise nothing extra was contributed. A female contributes 1 egg, nothing else is needed.
If a woman concieves and the next day falls into a coma. She can be fed intrevenously and give birth. She wakes up a year later and someone says here you baby. A biological function has taken place. What extra did she put forth? Nothing. When a pregnant woman is sleeping is the extra still taking place? Women have actually given birth who didn’t even know they were pregnant. I know you’ve all heard the stories. I guaruntee if a pregnant woman goes about her business she’ll give birth. No extra effort is required.
luke123: Do you think that women should be allowed abuse back in retaliation, and advocate for special treatment in court to forgive them if they do ?
Can you put that into English, or provide a link (to Praxis) so I have some idea what you think you are saying here?
@Mr. Slave,
So what bodily function does a male do, besides a sperm, that ze can fall into a coma and be presented with a baby when ze wakes up?
Dave, Did the female vampire win? I’ll bet she did. And I’m sure it was sexy too.
It’s only for Mississippi, and you’ll note that kidnapping, armed robbery, capital murder, and rape all have punishments of up to life. Out of the results of those crimes, only one is permanent in the way that you’re talking about. In a sense, you appear to be arguing for a complete overhaul of the CJ system to fit your idiosyncratic wishes.
Look, attempted murder is also punishable very seriously though there is no objective damage.
It’s about the damage that can possibly occur by this crime. If you threaten someone with guns to give you their money it’s not a big step to actually kill someone. That’s why a robbery with fake guns will not be punished that severe.
Rape on the other hand is just unconsensual intercourse.
That’s also the reason why rape is such a problematic crime, so difficult to persecute and so prone to miscarriage of justice.
Good night.
Slaveman: How did the imaginary woman and/or her imaginary boyfriend know she was pregnant at one week, and what was this magical substance he gave her that caused an abortion without any risk of harmful effects to the person who had the abortion? If we’re going to be setting legal precedent here on manboobz, I wanna be sure to have all the facts.
You know, all this stuff that NWO is talking about is why I support more research into the male birth control pill, so we can debunk him by saying “why didn’t he take his pill then?”
That said: NWO, men have several options if they don’t want Teh Baybieez, of varying effectiveness; the more ineffective methods can be combined. They can engage in outercourse or other sexual activities that can’t lead to pregnancy. They can use condoms, which they should anyway unless they’re in committed relationships in which STD test results have been exchanged. They can attempt to screen for and only sleep with women who don’t want children. They can pull out. If certain that they don’t want children, they can get a vasectomy.
Alex, the only extra you did was terminate a seperate life, with Big Daddy’s blessing.
NWO: A female contributes 1 egg, nothing else is needed.
Ok… We can test this. We get an egg-donor, put the egg in your hand, and you can whack off onto it.
Nine months later you should have a baby.
” it’s almost as if my kind of feminism is sort of premised on the notion that women are NOT perfect princesses, but, you know, are human beings with good points and bad points just like men?”
That has nothing to do with feminism. There have been evil women in fiction since the old fairytales. The evil stephmother, the evil witch who eats children….
I think she should too, NWO. Buy sometimes nature provides accidents without any human’s consent. And sometimes people make dumb mistakes.
Either way, my view is that a woman has the right to control who lives in her uterus, and if the embryo can’t live anywhere else, that’s the embryo’s problem.
There should be a term for someone who insists on trying to have conversations they’re not intellectually capable of having.
What’s your real name, NWOslave? Because I think we should name that term after you.
@Pecunium,
I will rephrase. Do you think it is acceptable to advocate for laws that would decriminalize women if they beat men ?
How exactly is that advocating equality ?
The link is here:http://www.examiner.com/domestic-violence-in-national/praxis-international-encourages-domestic-violence-when-properly-applied
@Mr. Slave,
Yes, I did. But that’s not what I asked you. *ahem* A female human does two bodily functions for a baby to be born: ze releases an egg and then ze carries it for nine months (or little less if it’s premature). Does a male human do two bodily functions for a baby to be born? I know ze ejaculates, but what else does ze do?
Marc:
Woman charged in with bank robbery, used toy gun
And this one:
Alabama man gets 15 years for failed toy gun robbery
“There have been evil women in fiction since the old fairytales. The evil stephmother, the evil witch who eats children….”
Ah yes, but the way feminism views the world is different. We don’t have to see each woman as either a maiden, a matron, or a crone. A woman can be a little of each if she chooses, or none of them at all. She can be herself, and I don’t have to put labels on her to feel comfortable about it.
And a character in a story can be a character in a story, and not define how I view All Women.
Okay, new idea. Instead of having an abortion, I hand over custody of the fetus to the father. Since men and women contribute the same to reproduction, he should have no problem bringing it to term!
…God, this is like trying to explain why clouds aren’t made of cotton balls.
ozymandias42, but once the conception has taken place, women/feminists reserve all rights to a mans genetic material. Isn’t that right? At her command a man may or may not be granted a child.
If the relationship is “committed” as in loyalty/fidelity STDs are an impossibility. A little hint, STDs can be wiped out by loyalty, but of course that runs counter to responsibly owning your sexuality. A feminist no-no.
I see, men can screen and pull out and vasectomies. What else can men do? Is it OK for mommies to paint little boys up with make-up and nail polish and dress them up like little princesses to break all those bad gender barriers? You’re so all about the menz aren’t ya?
Gee, it all sounds too good to be true. Ozzy cares so damn much about da menz.
@Mr. Slave, Slave man,
A female human does two bodily functions for a baby to be born: ze releases an egg and then ze carries it for nine months (or little less if it’s premature). Does a male human do two bodily functions for a baby to be born? I know ze ejaculates, but what else does ze do?
“I see, men can screen and pull out and vasectomies. What else can men do? Is it OK for mommies to paint little boys up with make-up and nail polish and dress them up like little princesses to break all those bad gender barriers? ”
Yes. These are all things men can do. Just because you say it with a sneer doesn’t mean it’s wrong.
How can you be in favor of personal freedom, and then say people can’t even choose their own (or their children’s) clothing? Now that’s fascism.
“Ah yes, but the way feminism views the world is different. We don’t have to see each woman as either a maiden, a matron, or a crone. A woman can be a little of each if she chooses, or none of them at all. She can be herself, and I don’t have to put labels on her to feel comfortable about it.
And a character in a story can be a character in a story, and not define how I view All Women.”
You make it sound like it’s a feminist invention that women should be looked at as multidimensional people. It’s not.
Of course the people in the fairy tale example are more one-dimensial, but the stories as we know today them have been watered down to make them suitable for children.
But I could just as well give Shakespeare as an example.
@Alex
A released unfertilized egg is dead. that’d be your period.
After conception takes place, one thing happens, life. The only extra that is ever done is abortion.
“Rape on the other hand is just unconsensual intercourse.That’s also the reason why rape is such a problematic crime, so difficult to persecute and so prone to miscarriage of justice.”
Ohhhhhh, is THAT why. Good to know, Marc.
Y’know, it’s not like helping you masturbate hasn’t been a lot of fun, but I have to say that the best part of the discussion has gotta be knowing that no one gives a shit what Marc thinks. Not just here, but anywhere. Not in the courthouses, the legislature, the halls of public opinion. No one is on board with what Marc’s philosophy of CJ and punishment except a brave and prinicpled band of other anonymous rapists and rape supporters.
Lol ur ridiculous rape apologia. Have a good sleep.
Seriously don’t think I’ve ever come across anybody stupid as NWO. And I read a lot of YouTube comments, so that’s some freaky competition.
Pecunium:
I’m loving the Marc pwnage. Keep up the good work.
Marc, I suppose in your world child molestation shouldn’t be a serious crime, either?
http://abcnews.go.com/US/hummer-mom-christine-hubbs-force-sex-teen-boys/story?id=13541399
Is that punishment too serious? Five years? What do you think?
No, because you are saying the “harm” of rape is minor. I am also saying the “Harm” of taking a fraction of one percent (and a really small fraction, at that) shouldn’t be punished the same as taking a car from someone who only has one car.
So it’s not a strawman, it’s an analogy.
You’re distorting everything I said and your analogy is totally flawed.
I never said the harm of rape “minor”.
The harm can be very serious, it can scar a woman for life. But it’s still psychological and therefore problematic to judge and impossible to measure. It can also scar someone for life to be a victim of malicious lies that even his relatives believe and we (rightfully) don’t punish that severely.
That you then make the same sort of teleological argument about “gay rape” is why we say you aren’t being consistent.
Heh? Teleological argument? Do I want to prove the existence of God? I’ve never made any teleological argument, Christ. It’s not teleology hat non-consensual intercourse doesn’t need to be painful (bodily pain), even if it’s homosexual.
It’s not like it’s real harm to have a cock shoved up your ass, or be made to give a blowjob. It’s not like someone blinded you.
Yes it’s not the same. I would rather be raped than blinded, believe me. What would be your choice?
But you discounted mine: 1: I agreed with you, bullying someone to suicide is at least as criminal as rape. I also said that problems of causal proof are harder, and the means of testing it aren’t present.
Ok, we agree on that. The only difference is that I think rape should be punished as severe as bullying is punished now. Not the other way around.
But the real fact is… you are are rape apologist. You want to make anything which doesn’t have a woman beaten = “not rape”. No one is going to be able to make what you consider a, “cogent argument” because you are arguing in bad faith, equivocating, question begging and moving goalposts.
Bad faith, huh??? What could be more bad faith than calling me a “rape apologist”. Again, evil distortions of everything I said. You have no decency, you proved that again!
So, go play with whatever it is you play with when you aren’t campainging in favor of rape while pretending to argue about the best way to punish it.
Unsubstantiated assumptions.
Luke, sorry for the confusion. Of course it’s not an invention of feminism that women are multidimensional people. That would be a principle of feminism.
@Graham
Since you being pro-feminist say I’m stupid it must be true. Whoa, you read a lot of YouTube comments ta boot. I knew I was in the presence of genius.
“A released unfertilized egg is dead. that’d be your period.”
All eggs are unfertilized when they’re released. They can only be fertilized between release and menstruation.
“After conception takes place, one thing happens, life. The only extra that is ever done is abortion.”
Or, a tremendous amount of the time, miscarriage. A lot of pregnancies end before the woman even knows she was pregnant.
Just wanted to keep you up on your biology during a slow bit at work.