Happy Pride Day, non-existent gay men!
Well, you're no lady. But I guess you'll do.
Today, as many of you no doubt know, is Gay Pride Day. Here in Chicago, that means the annual Pride Parade, a celebration of all things LGBTQetc — and a nice aerobic workout for parade participants. (Gyrating on a float for three hours dressed in a leather harness and thong will burn roughly 1000 calories. But beware of chafing!)
Rookh Kshatriya, proprieter of the Anglobitch blog (devoted to the notion that women in the Anglosphere are, well, bitches), has evidently decided to celebrate Pride Weekend by offering us all his theories on gay male sexuality. Which is to say, his theory that there is no such thing as gay male sexuality, and that all those gay men out marching today would much rather be spending their Sunday eating bagels and doing the New York Times crossword puzzle with some comely (non-lesbian) lasses.
Yep, in Rookh’s World, gay men – or, as he puts it, “gay” men — are actually nothing more than exceptionally horny straight men who have been unfairly denied sex-on-demand with women of their choosing.
Let’s let him explain this:
Despite their rhetoric about lifestyles and the contemplation of flowers, gay men are clearly entranced by orgasm to an extent far surpassing that of heterosexual men.
Alas, in our Feminazified world, women sometimes refuse to have sex with men. Deprived a natural outlet for their sexy urges, horny dudes have to, well, improvise a bit. Why try to finagle your way into a vagina assiduously guarded by some dumb lady, when other dudes just as horny as you have holes of their own available for the asking?
As Rookh sees it, these uber-horny dudes really have no other choice.
[A]re most gay men just hyper-sexualized males – a self-selecting group whose priapic urges can only be satisfied by rejecting the relative sexual deprivation inescapably attendant on heterosexuality? The more one considers this possibility, the more plausible it seems. Even some badass with the looks of Apollo, the Game of Roissy and the confidence of a warlord would struggle to enter a nightclub and say: “I want sex NOW!” and expect to get it.
A terrible, terrible injustice. But there is a way out:
Yet homosexual men can enter any gay bath house in any Anglosphere city, say the very same words and expected to be sexually serviced by several men in a matter of minutes! In short, the sexual mismatch between the sexes makes the heterosexual lifestyle a poor option for any hyper-sexualized male – a non-option, in fact, if he wants to fully slake his sexual thirsts. By contrast, adopting homosexuality allows him to instantly indulge his every sexual whim in every manner conceivable.
Unless, of course, these whims involve sex with, you know, women. But lust is apparently stronger than mere sexual orientation. As Rookh sees it, homosexuality is the only rational choice for uber-horny men – even if they’d rather be boning women.
Since sex is so scarce and difficult to acquire in a heterosexual context, it simply makes no sense for an Anglo-American male with priapic urges to remain heterosexual – hence the self-selection of hyper-sexualized males towards homosexual lifestyles, not to mention the hyper-sexualized nature of homosexuality itself.
Is this all a prelude to a touching coming-out announcement by our man Rookh?
No such luck. It’s actually an excuse for, yes, more feminism-bashing. For it is the evil feminists who, in Rookh’s world, have been encouraging the “female sexual ostracism” of poor suffering straight men:
As we all know, women seek to control men by limiting sexual supply, be it representational (pornography) or actual (prostitution) – and that feminism is, essentially, an institution created for that purpose.
And so, in Rookh’s world,
homosexuality has advanced in lock-step with feminism. … [F]eminism – by assailing marital monogamy and allowing women to indulge their primordial attraction to dangerous thugs, moronic bullies and swaggering plutocrats – produced an unwanted ‘rump’ of educated, economically stable but sexually disenfranchised males. Given that gay males are disproportionately intelligent, solvent and educated, it is fairly obvious that members of this group have opted for homosexuality as a means of escaping the living death of involuntary celibacy, that the two phenomena are in fact closely related and that feminism is directly responsible for the advancement of homosexuality across the Anglosphere.
Feminism, by encouraging women to say “no” when they don’t actually want to have sex, may have created modern homosexuality, in Rookh’s view. But that doesn’t mean that feminists actually like gay dudes. No. Ick!
[T]he vast majority of Anglo females detest gay men as vehemently as they hate men in general. … the real link between pan-Anglosphere feminism and homosexuality [is that] the latter is a reaction to the former, which hates it with boundless counter-reactionary zeal.
Yeah, seems to me that the only one here who really “detest[s] gay men” is, well, Rookh, so much so that he’s decided to completely erase gay male sexuality – to put “gay” in scare quotes – in order to give himself another opportunity to run down feminists and women in general.
Now, human sexuality is a weird, messy, complicated, wonderful thing. It may well be that some bisexual men end up having sex with men more often than with women because they find it easier to find male sex partners for casual sex. But guys who are thoroughly gay – who would score a 6 on the famous Kinsey scale – don’t actually want to have sex with women. They really don’t. Drop a beautiful, eligible, horny (straight or mostly straight) woman in the midst of a bunch of Kinsey 6 guys, and this is what you get:
Court’s free!
Posted on June 26, 2011, in alpha males, antifeminism, evil women, homophobia, I'm totally being sarcastic, incel, misogyny, MRA, oppressed men, penises, PUA, pussy cartel, rapey, reactionary bullshit, sex, vaginas, western women suck. Bookmark the permalink. 405 Comments.
I probably would. After all, I have a facial deformity.
Oh dear god.You do not have a facial deformity. Get over yourself.
You wanted an answer, clearly hoping to back me into a corner and make me a hypocrite. Unfortunately for you, the answer is yes, if a girl had a facial deformity comparable to mine. Which is considerable.
Spare me the details…
Okay Marc, I’ve give you the G-rated version. When a mommy and another mommy love each other very much, they have a special cuddle…
Yes, it’s true that lesbians report having sex less frequently than gays or straights, and are more likely to have (in some cases, quite happily) sexless romantic relationships.
It’s also true that women with female partners are more likely to actually enjoy what sex they do having. So…I’d call it a draw?
Besides, the point is not to prove that women’s sex drive is exactly the same as men’s; that would be absurd. The point is that women do, in fact, have an independent sex drive.
Also, why would you call women with facial deformities “very rare”? Compared to men? Do you think that somehow being female makes your face biologically inviolate?
@sarahejones:
Now now, lets not go onto banned topics. And, at the risk of being very rude to the person in this photo, I wonder, MRAL, whether you would date someone who looked like this?
One of my gay guy friends had a relationship with someone who knew he had HIV but did not tell my friend about it…until they broke up. The break up involved telling my friend ‘fuck you – I was messing with you the whole time and now you have HIV’. My poor friend was an absolute mess.
My ex, no-where near as monstrous as that previous guy, cheated on me twice – told me I was ugly and a loser (making out like him cheating was my fault).
People – gay, straight, queer, men, women, trans – can all be assholes MRAL.
I flatly do not believe men are as mean as women. I don’t believe it. I simply don’t believe it. I see truckloads of evidence every fucking day.
What evidence do you see? In the last week, what are all these instances? How about today? What did you see? Truckloads means a lot right? :3 Like is this CLEAR evidence or do we have to do a bit of mind reading to figure out obv somebody is acting with evil cruelty or something? xD
(sry I was shopping… so I am catching up)
Most women look at non-alphas of their age like shit on their shoe, like second-class human beings
Most? How many is most? o_O How many women on THIS forum do you think act like this? Or are we all exceptions? (if we’re all exceptions, perhaps you SHOULD be hanging out w/ feminists :3 )
I don’t think so. Sure rejection would exist, I am sure, but men don’t have a hugely inflated view of themselves, in which they reject all but 10/10 suitors and metaphorically spit on the rest. Furthermore, when men turn people down (men or women) they aren’t cruel; they don’t treat the rejected person like shit, a non-human entity worthy of nothing but scorn.
Finally, Simone, the problem is that 9/10 women treat omega and beta men like SHIT, and so I have to get treated that way many times over if I am to be successful with a nice woman.
Again, I think you need to tell us how you know this? How sure are you this is true and what makes you so sure? :3 Do you think that we all must observe this in our day to day lives (or practice this ourselves?) and why don’t we see the things you do?
Also, I so would take you out if I was nearby :3 I think you might enjoy it, I’d def try to get some girls to talk to you… I mean if it goes badly, we can move on :3 but it’d be fun :3 And you wouldn’t need to be worried cuz you have your tall (occasional) model girl pass into awesomeness in me! :D And I’d introduce you to my gay friends and you can talk to them and it’d give you more exps to add to your knowledge base and maybe change your conclusions a bit :D
And then we’d go clubbing! :D
Kirby that link doesn’t work. Buy those with extreme facial deformities- worse than mine- I would likely turn down, obviously on a case-by-case basis. But as I said, I would be nice about it (unlike bitch women) and continue to have much sympathy. Those with deformities similar to mine, I’d look past. I’d have to be a hypocrite not to (much like you fymynysts).
Lesbian sex doesn’t work because there are no penises. Penises are the center of the universe, this is why straight couples and gay men have lots of sex and lesbians pretty much stop talking to each other after 6 months out of sheer dissatisfaction. The superiority of the phallus is that undeniable. I’ve watched golf games more exciting than lesbian porn and I’m sure most guys would agree.
@MRAL:
Apologies, something must have messed up.
How extreme of a facial deformity do you think this is?
MRAL, stop looking at everything in life through the lens of getting laid.
Get more than two friends. Specifically seek out female friends, not with the desire to fuck them; just because having friends is nice.
I just had two friends (one male and one female, neither of whom I want to fuck) over today to help me with a school project. I had to analyse them watching TV, as sort of a mini anthropological study.
We watched a Doctor Who episode, a few segments of a really bad Batman film serial from the 50’s and the first half of the Twilight: Eclipse Rifftrax. It was fun. Really fun.
If you just learn to simply have fun and enjoy yourself, maybe the “horrors” of not getting laid won’t seem so bad. Believe me, I know those “horrors” all too well. They’re really not that bad when you put them in perspective.
@Arksibalt
Stop stealing your worldview from dimwitted supporting characters in Kevin Smith movies.
But golf isn’t v exc-
oh iiiiiii get it xD
actually I\ve watched golf that’s more exciting than hetero sex xD like when Tom Watson almost won the Open Championship xD I actually skipped my run that morning (did it later >_> ) and watched the whole last round… (I was sad he lost :\ tho apparently he’s a jerkface) and I would MUCH rather watch Tom Watson play golf than have sex XD
I’d be surprised if most guys out there would rather watch the LPGA than watch lesbian smex tho xD But maybe they do! Given how much lesbian porn sells, I think that the LPGA is missing out on advertisements! “BORED WITH LESBIAN SEX? COME WATCH LADIES GOLF!” xD That’d be AWESOME :D
@Spearhafoc oh is that a quote from a movie? :o (I dun watch KS movies xD not out of preference, just never did xD ) awww :( then it means that ppl aren’t going to go watch the LPGA is giant droves :(
OMG, I was going through old music today and gave an old Jewel album a listen… and MRAL, you should really listen to Pieces of You by Jewel.
It’s striking to me that there’s a song with MRAL’s exact attitude towards women spelt out in it…. from 16 years ago. It makes me sad that the world isn’t all that much further along since the time that was written.
But mostly it’s weird to me that it outlines so exactly everything we’ve heard from MRAL in the first two verses.
Not an exact quote, no. But his point seems to match one of Jason Lee’s scenes in Chasing Amy, which was actually pretty good. It was before Smith’s movies really started to suck.
Basically, Lee plays a complete asshole moron. He and his “everyone likes cock, so lesbians can’t really exist”-opinion are’t supposed to be taken seriously.
Kate:
Wow… I’m seriously bummed out right now… why does that song have to be relevant? -__- But yeah, the first two verses seem to sum up a ton of the misogyny we see around…
Well, MRAL, then you’re not a hypocrite, at least on this point.
I just think you’re more obsessed with appearances (your own and those of others) and perceived status than pretty much anyone I’ve ever run across. Well, maybe that’s not right; a lot of people are obsessed with appearance (including a lot of gay men, which is why the gym in my neighborhood does such good business).
My question is: why do you blame people for dating other people they consider attractive? Why do you get angry if conventionally pretty women date conventionally handsome men? Assuming they value conventional attractiveness as much as you do, and setting aside questions of personality, compatablity,etc etc, why wouldn’t (straight) women want to date the handsomest man they could find who is willing to date them?
Aren’t you (again, setting aside personality, etc) interested in dating the most attractive woman who would date you? If so, why do you get angry if women you consider betas and omegas date men who are “above them” on your Greek scale? You’re hoping to date women who aren’t omegas, right?
And why i sit any of your business whom people date, anyway? If an ugly women (or at least a woman you consider ugly) is dating a handsome man, what’s it to you? If an ugly man is dating a beautiful woman, what’s THAT to you? People are allowed to date whomever they want. (And heck, if some “ugly” gal scores a “handsome” guy, doesn’t that leave one more pretty woman out there for you to pursue?)
@Spearhafoc oh I HAVE seen a bit of that movie xD Doesn’t he turn out to be gay at the end?
I think it’s implied. He does seem pretty eager to participate in the hypothetical threesome that Affleck’s character proposes.
MRAL, have you ever walked down a street? Have you ever been in a mall? How about a sporting event? Have you ever been anywhere that people congregate?
I have. I have seen overweight men, homely men, poorly dressed men, raggedy men, men who likely don’t have the greatest of jobs, and guess what? So very, very often I see these men with women.
They may not always be the most conventionally “attractive” women. They are often overweight, homely, poorly dressed, raggedy, and may not have the greatest of jobs.
If so many people who aren’t “alphas” or even “betas” can find love, then the problem isn’t with how you look. It’s with you. I see men you would likely class as “omegas” in relationships all the time. How happy are they? I don’t know. But what I do know is if they spent their lives wallowing in self-pity, they’d be alone.
Well ya’ll already know my feeings about your beloved LGBTQWXZY social/physical contructs. Feminism will support anything that isn’t straight men, (especially straight white men), the more degrading the better. Legislating morality with your votes, lol. Hatred must be maintained.
But to bring a little joy to your icy hearts my day was absolute shit. What was supposed to be an easy 7 hour day turned into 14 hours of not one damn thing working. Plus I got a 7 AM flight which means I gotta leave at 4 AM. The worst part is I can’t even blame you hypocritical, bigots for it. Or can I?
@NWO:
So… anything except being a straight white man is degrading? I see… Could you, once and for all, explain how LGBTQ is a physical construct?
The 7 hour thing? Yeah… that was Ami…
It was the Reptilians. They feed off human misery, and nobody is as miserable as MRAs make themselves. They love you guys.
Also, that comma is completely superfluous. Lose it.
Oh ya, NWOslave is the last two verses of that song… it’s spooky how a song that’s 16 years old is still so relevant.
I love how the trolls are all coming out to celebrate the kicking off of Pride! xD
@Kirby And yeah that was ttlly me xD When Ami goes out to queer clubs and watches a drag show, God makes a queerphobic troll suffer >_>;;
In all seriousness tho, I’m sry for your sudden tough day D: And for what’s coming up :\
(why do I suspect I’m going to get a you pampered princess screed back? xD )
Only response of the night, (far too tired). Kirbywarp wins the prize.
T=physical construct.
It’s a “construct” like the ones produced by Green Lantern rings.
Why else do you think the various corps form a rainbow?
“The worst part is I can’t even blame you hypocritical, bigots for it. Or can I?”
I believe in your mis-attribution of blame powers, NWO!
Futrelle, it all really revolves around the actions of the beta women (who I would say make up roughly 50% of the female population). As I said, these betas chase alpha cock, but for the most part can’t lock it down. They can get one-night stands from alphas, but (in general) they won’t be in healthy relationships. They also usually get treated like crap because they’re trying to date out of their league. But I feel no sympathy because, in other words, beta women choose this shit over a normal, healthy relationship with a beta male (their natural male counterpart). I think part of it might be the fact that women have inflated views of themselves due to a female supremacist society, and so beta women can’t accept their beta status. In this sense the old motif “treating women like crap makes them love you” holds some water, except it’s not the “treating them like crap” part that they like. It’s just the fact that they’re so fucking desperate for alpha attention they’ll put up with that shit over being treated like a normal person by a male beta.
So this is the situation. Alpha men and alpha women are all good, they’re mostly in relationships. Beta women are spending countless time and energy getting randomly fucked by alpha men over just talking to beta men (their counterparts). Omega women are omega by choice, so whatever. Omega and (for the most part) beta men (60-80% of the population) get to be basically involuntarily celibate for most of their lives, maybe getting a few lucky lays and a lucky marriage at 45 after a lifetime of frustration.
Uh oh… I’m a physical construct! :O
I imagine myself as some giant walking mechanical terror now xD Like… an AT-AT! Or an AA-AA for me! :D
*tromps around shooting lasers* xDDD
Jesus, is this still the MRAL Therapy Board?
I flatly do not want tobelieve men are as mean as women. I don’t want tobelieve it. I simply don’twant to believe it. I choose tosee truckloads of evidence every fucking day.
FTFY.
@MRAL (if you didn’t read my comment above, which you SHOULD b/c you can imagine us clubbing and hanging out :D I think it’d be fun! And I’d ttlly get you into the best clubs and to meet the hottest ppl :D )
How do you know all this? o_O How are you so sure?
Actually I like Spearhafoc’s thing better
I’m a ring construct! :D
Okay, who’s ring was I constructed from? o_O
(also spear, which comic shop do you frequent? maybe we’ve met before o_o)
@NWO:
Hooray! I’m so honored to accept this award, I want to thank all the people who made it possible.
…
hmm….
Really, its just because Ami screwed with his work day. Thanks Ami!
@MRAL:
So basically, you feel sorry for all those beta women who are chasing the guy of their dreams that will never love them, never realizing that they could find love if only they could look away? Towards you? Or is it more “I’m never getting laid if all these beta women keep chasing alphas, and I don’t want to sleep with Omegas because why would I want to date someone below me on the scale?”
I’m more straight than not, but there’s something about Tom of Finland…
Not so. The statistics just don’t agree with you. The average age that males lose their virginity is 17. You and I are statistical outliers.
Comics N’ More, usually. Silver Snail, occasionally.
MRAL, so how exactly did you arrive at these conclusions? They sound a lot like MRA/MGTOW/PUA soundbites and most of them bear very little resemblance to the real world as I know it. So, [citation needed] for most of these assertions.
Some of them are so ludicrously wrong I can’t believe you can type them with a straight face. 60-80% of men involuntarily celibate? Uh, no. According to the Kinsey institute:
90% of men and 86% of women have had sex in the past year
18-29 year olds have sex an average of 112 times per year, 30-39 year olds an average of 86 times per year, and 40-49 year olds an average of 69 times per year
http://www.kinseyinstitute.org/resources/FAQ.html#frequency
Lesee… Roissy says I’m an Omega (or a mangina, or both). This guys says I’m only straight because I’m “undersexed”, and MRAL says I’m a 5’9″ inch, 120 lb. Alpha.
No wonder people say greek is hard.
MRAL, you do realize that about 60% of adult women are overweight?
If all overweight women are all omegas; and 20% of women are alphas; how can 50% be betas?
Are you a hypocrite, or do you just really suck at math?
Men lie about this stuff, because out misandrist society shames men who don’t Fuck Like An Alpha. And that’s taking into account ALL men, including 30-35+ married people.
@David:
You know just as well as I that only Alpha assholes and bitches answer polls like that. Beta males are so opressed they can’t even answer in anonymous polls for fear of being ridiculed.
Well Fuck. Fucking hell. MRAL, why the hell do you have to go POE on me and prove my sarcasm correct? Just.. Why would you do that?
MRAL – we’re just going to have to agree to disagree. My partner who is 6’3″, a little overweight and a nerd (plays D&D, got bullied a lot at school for being a ‘wog’) and by your rough outline is a beta, has had LOTS of sex with a variety of women. I mean, his ‘number’ is in the high teens. And one of my friends refers to him as an ‘honorary skirt’ because he is perfectly happy to hang out with groups of women and isn’t phased by lengthy discussions of periods/uncomfortable sexual experiences etc. So, yes, he treats women like human beings…and he has gotten lots of heterosexual sex.
Facts be damned. If it feels true to MRAL, it must be gospel.
I’ll use this as an excuse to post one of my favourite Kids in the Hall bits.
Lol! Though, seriously, JUST herbal tea and pain killers? The list is much longer: hot water bottle, tea, chocolate, pain killers, back rub… just to name a few ;)
He’s 6’3, I knew it. That’s automatic Beta Status (at least). As I said, women have a FUCKING CLINICAL OCD-like obsession with height.
And despite the posturing on this site, almost all the boyfriends mentioned are tall. Bunch of fucking hypocrites.
I have OCD. I fail to see how that fits, even if we assume the motives you do.
More Kids in the Hall. Similar subject matter.
@MRAL:
Nope. You just ignore everyone who says their boyfriends are short. But in a fair society, you’d expect an even distribution across height (or at least the same distribution that height is). So some will have tall boyfriends. *shrug*
No, 8/10 of the boyfriends mentioned are above 5’11. Fuck this place.
In a way I prefer classic alpha bitches. It’s analogous to the North and the South during the civil rights era. Many black activists actually preferred the South because they were upfront about their racism and hatred- “we don’t like you, and that’s it.” Whereas the North was much more difficult, and smiled out of one side of their mouth while grimacing distastefully with the other.
Feminism is the North.
“And despite the posturing on this site, almost all the boyfriends mentioned are tall. Bunch of fucking hypocrites.”
I have dated one person much shorter than me (5’4″), one much taller (6’8″), two slightly shorter (5’7″-5’8″) and two slightly taller (5’10”-6’ish). I realize I’m just a single data point here (an anecdote, if you will) but just speaking up to fight the possibility of confirmation bias….
Then fucking leave, you whiny turd.
Have you ever noticed MRAL is like Cabbage Head?
“In a way I prefer classic alpha bitches. It’s analogous to the North and the South during the civil rights era. Many black activists actually preferred the South because they were upfront about their racism and hatred- “we don’t like you, and that’s it.” Whereas the North was much more difficult, and smiled out of one side of their mouth while grimacing distastefully with the other.
Feminism is the North.”
Yeah, um, MRAL, people not liking you for being an utter and clueless piece of work (example: coming up with insulting analogy comparing your sad life to national racism) is not the equivalent to the travails of the Civil Rights Era.
Glad to see you in top to-ridiculous-to-be-a-real-guy form though.
Won’t work, spearhafoc. He’s already been compared to Eric Cartman, and he considered it a compliment.
@MRAL, women do not have a collective compulsive obsession about height, you do.
Moving on, sex drives vary a lot between individuals. And, as someone who has had sex with both men and lesbians, the latter was every bit as eager as the former. Do a google search, there are plenty of hetero women out there who want more sex than their boyfriends do. Sure, there are some celibate and asexual women (both queer and hetero), but there are also some celibate and asexual men (both queer and hetero).
“He’s 6’3, I knew it. That’s automatic Beta Status (at least). As I said, women have a FUCKING CLINICAL OCD-like obsession with height.”
You *knew* my partner was 6’3″? Riiight. I only mentioned it because it’s one of the two measures you have for alpha, beta, omega status (face and height). I would prefer it if he were shorter…kissing someone who is that tall takes some doing. We often have to find convenient steps to make out on. And I was saying that yes, he was a beta according to your thingy…and he has lots of sex which contradicts your argument that betas and omegas don’t ever get laid ever.
Also, one of the hottest guys I know (who would have nothing to do with me, which was fine but a little sad) was 5’4″. I gotta say, a lot of short men I know (like the neighbor I had for some time who beat up on his fiancee who was HAWT, in that black hair blue eyes and 6ft kindof way, and taller than him) have complexes about it. Yes, you qualify as more masculine when you are taller and this sucks…but the bigger problem is how much of a jerk you are about being short.
My boyfriend is 5’8″. As I’ve said before. Not that anyone ever listens to me …
*sigh*
Hey, do you think the Chicken Lady is a beta? Or an alpha?
Men’s Rights Activist Lieutenant | June 26, 2011 at 8:40 pm
Men lie about this stuff, because out misandrist society shames men who don’t Fuck Like An Alpha. And that’s taking into account ALL men, including 30-35+ married people.
If everybody is lying, how do you know what you know? o_O
Just another anecdote, but I’ve dated guys who were 5’4″ (I’m 5’3″) all the way up to 6’8.” I ended up marrying a 5’9″ guy. Height isn’t a priority (and frankly, it’s more than a little awkward to interact with people a lot taller than myself) – intelligence, a sarcastic sense of humor, and an interest in the same kinds of nerdy activities and political views that I have are much, MUCH more important. If you want a successful relationship MRAL, try some different activities and find a good friend group that’s not just guys.
The guy I’m crushing on right now is either my height or shorter (I dunno, I have trouble judging the heights of ppl around my height xD I think he’s shorter, but I could be wrong (which is why I said either) it’s not like I ask ppl to stand back to back w/ me xD
But he’s freakishly awesomely laid back and smexy and has a cute little rat tail xD
He also has a body I’m pretty sure you would not wish for xD
Oh and am I the only one who finds it rly cute that NWO has had a busy day and a busy day coming up, but still drops by to drive by troll? xDDDD
It’s so cute.. he’s like Norm in Cheers or something XD (or Morn in DS9! which would work for the Deep Space Whine xD )
I can’t find a Youtube clip of Bruce McCulloch talking about his height. Here’s a Hulu video…
I can’t view it here in Soviet Canuckistan, but I think that’s the one I was thinking of.
a lot of short men I know have complexes about it.
FUCKING HILARIOUS. Or maybe short men are called out on ANY kind of masculine behavior BECAUSE they’re short, when THE SAME BEHAVIOR IS EXPECTED FROM NORMAL MEN. FUCKING HEIGHTIST PRICCMK.
(that’s not to say *I* have a problem w/ it btw, but I’m pretty sure you wouldn’t xD )
also did MRAL actually say that VERY FEW women are disfigured or disabled? o_O And that our only issue is rly being fat? and that can be fixed? xD
What’s a “PRICCMK”?
MRAL, you can’t even hide your obvious anger issues over the Internet. Trust me, your height isn’t your problem.
Get some friends.
How come MRAL doesn’t answer how he knows the things he knows… or elaborate on this “I SEE IT HAPPENING EVERY DAY IN TRUCKLOADS” thing xD I rly want to know what he sees… like today.. what examples of this did you see? o: truckloads means quite a LOT right? xD