Let us prey
Also, nuns totally put out.
When the dudes at the Pro-Male/Anti-Feminist Technology blog aren’t wistfully looking forward to the days in which sexbots and artificial wombs make mere flesh-and-blood ladies obsolete, they’re pondering the crucial spiritual questions of our age, like how to pick up hot sluts at church. Any church, really, so long as it’s full of hot sluts. The blogger there – who doesn’t give his name, so let’s just call him Anti – recently highlighted this observation, from commenter The Fifth Horseman:
[C]hurch would be a great place for a PUA to run Game …
1) There is a built-in structure to meet women that takes out the difficulty of doing a cold approach.
2) All other men there are so pedestalizing, that the competition to a man who actually runs moderate Game is nil.
3) Sunday morning = where else would you Game at that time?
4) Once you have slept with a couple women in that church, simply move on to another church. Who cares if one is Baptist and the other is Episcopalian and the third is Lutheran? Just use up the desirable women and move on.
Jesus wept.
But Anti didn’t, and added his two cents to the discussion:
All you need to do to use the “Sunday Morning Nightclub” is find a church with single women. Some churches are pretty much all families so avoid them. Other churches are supertraditional where everyone gets married before 20. … I would also avoid Eastern Orthodox churches. …
When it comes to meeting the women there, you already have built in openers to use such as how “you have been looking for a church”. These women will put out for you. You aren’t going to find any virgins waiting for marriage (with the exception of a few outliers with very unusual issues). The women there are better described as “sluts for Jesus”.
Absolutely. All you need to do, fellas, is to approach them calmly and confidently, look quickly down at your crotch, then directly into their eyes, and ask them: “Would you like to meet … Little Jesus”
Verily, I say unto you, it works every time.
Posted on June 20, 2011, in antifeminism, misogyny, PUA, sex, sexy robot ladies, sluts, white knights. Bookmark the permalink. 488 Comments.
I think this guy needs to actually go to church first before thinking that he can just score randomly.
Hahaha. I would totally sleep with a guy who used the little Jesus line on me.
And women aren’t as a dumb as he thinks. They are going to figure out pretty quick why he joined the church. Especially when he shows no interest in, you know, the actual church.
As a lifelong atheist, I’m kind of morbidly curious to know if this would really work or not.
Given that the Gamboiz are wrong about nearly everything, I’m guessing not.
Get this guy together with the Mormon dude from a few weeks ago, complaining about the ladies showing up to their Singles get togethers.
And Sarah- remember, the commonly held belief among a lot of these guys is that women don’t mature past adolescence. >.<. I feel dirty having typed that.
Hey Dave, I’m sure with a little effort you could’ve found a few comments on PUAs at synagogue’s or Mosque’s. Of course that would’ve made you either anti-semetic or Islamophobic. Thats bad.
Best stick with the leftist, MSM full endorsement of wholesale bashing of them bad ole Christians. YeeeHaw, can’t wait till we bring back the colluseum. Tossin them backward Christians to the lions sure does make for some good entertainment.
Nice pic BTW, really covers the whole gambit. Lotsa crosses, slut nun dressed in red smokin a cigarette after some steamy forbidden sex. Probably right there in the church. Qweet!
O<—– The point
o<—- NWO's comment.
@filetofswedishfish
The point is my dear, does Dave have the guts to show a picture of similar nature depicting a woman in a synagogue or Mosque? If not, you know you’ve been indoctrinated that the only faith it’s acceptable and endorsed to mock is Christianity.
Prove me wrong.
Footslave, why don’t you save some of your righteous indignation for the people who are encouraging their followers to exploit your religion to GET LAID?
@speedlines
Don’t change the subject.
Prove me wrong.
Hey. Slavie. I hate you.
You’re wrong. I know it, and I don’t feel the need to prove it. So there!
Also, that picture of the nun is totally hot. I’d make sacrilegious love to her.
Mr Slave, I’m sure if these guys were talking about ways to pick up women in a synagogue or mosque instead of, you know, a church, then he would.
Prove me wrong.
As someone who was raised Catholic, I fully feel it’s my right to mock Christianity. I mock all other religions also, but since the US is still 85% (last I heard) Christian, sure they’re the go-to when it comes to mocking, because duh. Making fun of the big guy vs. making fun of the little guy, obviously you go for the big guy, it makes it funnier.
P.S. The Catholic church still thinks you’re all heretics. My dad is still Catholic, so I know. He still can’t get his brain around an atheist daughter, especially after forcing me through 18 years of Catholic indoctrination.
@NWO I’ll let you in on a Feminist Secret: The point of David’s post was not to mock Christianity. I’m a Christian and I think the nun picture is funny. So…I don’t know. Do what you want with that. I’m aware that it’s probably dumb to engage with this d00d in all seriousness, but I kinda wanted to say that, just in case he really honestly thought that? Sorry yall if I’m encouraging trolls.
NWO: @speedlines
Don’t change the subject.
Prove me wrong.
Speedlines was on topic, you changed the subject.
One can’t “prove you wrong” because you reject all proof (hey… where are those papers on mtDNA and that one from the White House? You said they proved your point… care to publish them and… “Prove me wrong?”).
Tell you what… since you seem so familiar with the PUA fora, how about you link to one of those synagogue/mosque hunting tip pieces you are upset about Dave not mocking.
Prove us wrong.
I think Jdate covers the Jewish community according to this song by What I Like About Jew
Footslave, if you’d quit drooling over the hot nun picture for a minute and actually READ THE ARTICLE, you would see that the subject is people exploiting religion to get laid.
So I repeat, why not get angry at them, instead of shooting the messenger?
It’s such a comically obvious derail. There’s no way someone could in good faith think that this post was about mocking Christianity. This isn’t an objection to the post; this is the “hey, look over there!” of debate tactics.
Or rather non-debate tactics, because no one here wants to badmouth Christianity, and NWO doesn’t want to talk about how skeevy it is to treat churches like vagina farms, so it’s really just a method to ensure we spend the rest of the thread talking past each other.
NWO, unless you are prepared to tell us that the practice of Christianity includes church-hopping by angry men for the purpose of pursuing a pump-and-dump crusade (pun TOTALLY intended) against women, then I don’t see how any sane person can perceive David’s post as a mockery of Christianity. What IS an embarrassment to Christianity, in this Jew’s opinion, is the existence of Christians like this “Fifth Horseman” fella. Perhaps you should direct your complaints at him instead.
As for the picture of the nun, let’s first note that it’s not obscene by any stretch of the imagination. The nun is depicted as a classic “pin-up girl”, and inasmuch as pin-up girls represented a fantasy, so this picture too, is a satirical representation of “Fifth Horseman’s” fantasy. You know, satire? Probably not, since you despise education.
Is the guy in the OP for real? o_O Or is he just pretending, trying to lead the PUA/MRA ppl down the garden path, trying to see if he can get them to try to seduce girls in church? xD
Like me, trying to sekritly manipulate everybody here to belie–
oh wait… wasn’t supposed to say that out loud xD
Ah, yes, the right-wing debate tactic of framing the debate. It doesn’t matter what the original post was about; as soon as NWO throws down the gauntlet it immediately becomes about mocking Christianity, and prove me wrong if you think it’s not.
Jesus liked hookers so why does NWOaf think he is better then the Savior?
You know what really makes me sad about the post, on reflection?
It presupposes that none of these guys actually believe in any religion, and none of them get any non-sexual social or emotional or community joy from going to church. (No offense to atheists; what I’m bothered by is just the assumption that there’s no other reason to do an activity than to chase tail.)
Sunday morning = where else would you Game at that time?
Sunday morning, dude. Read a book. Go for a walk. Hang out with friends. (Go to church and actually pray?) Play videogames. Sleep in.
The scariest part of this post isn’t that these guys are exploiting religion for their Game; it’s that they seem to think it’s normal to have no life whatsoever except for Game.
For all of you who say, “don’t shoot the messenger” or say what I’m saying here over there. Well I have, even on the Spearhead. The Slave is hated and banned from many places.
None of you can admit that bashing Christians is acceptable. Everyone of you, even those of you who say you are Christians have no problem mocking your own faith. Thats how indoctrinated you are. You take delight in mocking your own faith. Theres no way any of you would dare mock any other faith with the veracity and joy you experience at mocking Christians, lest you be called a poltically incorrect name.
It’s no different that the wholesale acceptance of mocking men, especially white men. It’s accepted and endorsed by the MSM. Seems like a little of that “invisible privilege” is showing thru.
What do you call someone who revels in mocking one faith but doesn’t dare mock any other? You tell me?
You can’t prove a negative – or at least, it’s very hard to do it.
Proof would require going through every online PUA/Game blog, website or forum and digging up every single comment that even tangentially references religion and then indexing ALL of them, and comparing the ones mentioning Christianity to the ones mentioning Islam/Judaism.
Here’s a hint: Sexy nun imagery is pervasive in American culture because enough people went to Catholic school or know someone who did. Get enough hormonal, pubescent teenagers staring at nuns all day, and there will arise some pretty intense fantasies about nuns. In Britain, there are no Catholic schools, but there are private schools – and so the fantasies are about schoomistresses, not nuns.
Have you ever met a Jew NWOaf? They tend to be really really self-critical and dare I say, mocking?
Muslims-well the religion has the prohibition built right into it so it makes it hard to be mocking.
NWO – Why are you so bigoted against elephants? They’re just innocent animals. They’re social and intelligent. And they’re endangered for Pete’s sake. You can’t justify it.
Your mindless crusade against elephants sickens and horrifies me. And you don’t even attempt to defend it.
I can’t believe you’re such a filthy elephant-hater. You probably like it when they get poached. I bet you have a house all full of ivory.
STOP EVERYTHING AND TELL ME WHY YOU HATE ELEPHANTS SO MUCH!
A wonder who the fifth horseman would be? There’s Death, Pestilence, War, Famine,,,
If the fifth horseman is an internet PUA…
Harassment?
Personally, the first thought that came to mind was Paper cuts xD
Death, Pestilence, War, Famine, Paper Cuts xD
And, for what it’s worth, I tend not to mock religions – but I criticize Judaism and Islam right along with pointing out all the flaws in Christianity and the self-hate it fosters within it’s adherents.
I do mock Discordianism, but that bitch Eris is totally asking for it.
Church Kittehs are cute!
…whoa. Did Slavey just say he’d been banned from the Spearhead? And I’m guessing it wasn’t for being too pro-female.
That’s an achievement.
I’m a Catholic, I can make myself feel guilty about nething.
Oh fuck you Victoria-She made me into the patron saint of Oreos!!!
(Just kidding on the FY. :) )
NWO: Dave is saying what they are doing is unacceptable. You are just to thick (or dishonest… Only you [and God] can know the answer to that one) to admit it.
Dave is saying the people saying, “go to church to take advantage of the women there” are dirtbags.
And you are upset at him for how he says it. That means you are against people who defend Christianity. Why are you against them so much?
Eyes, motes, beams.
As to what I call someone who will mock one faith, but not any others… NWOslave.
I agree with Holly. Slave why would anyone hare elephants? You’re a complete asshole for hating elephants. In fact now that you’ve implied that elephants are to be held in such low regard you need to prove to us why. If I was David I’d put you on moderation until you explain yourself.
For those who are interested the SCOTUS also handed down Turner v Rogers regarding noncustodial parents facing jail time for failure to pay child support.
“Under the circumstances, Turner’s incarceration violated due process because he received neither counsel nor the benefit of alter-native procedures like those the Court describes. He did not have clear notice that his ability to pay would constitute the critical ques-tion in his civil contempt proceeding. No one provided him with a form (or the equivalent) designed to elicit information about his fi-nancial circumstances. And the trial court did not find that he was able to pay his arrearage, but nonetheless found him in civil con-tempt and ordered him incarcerated.”
Ooooh, OUCH, getting smacked by the SCOTUS must hurt!
File under “things that make me glad I’m an apatheist*”.
* I used to call myself an agnostic but I decided that implied too much wondering. I don’t wonder whether there’s a god – I just don’t care. Wondering would take too much effort. And then my friend Pixel mentioned the term “apatheist” to me and I knew I had found my true calling! When I’m not indulging my apathy I contemplate chaos theory and how that relates to the deeper nature of the universe.
It’s OK for everyone to mock me. After all I’m a white man, after much research became a Christian, I’m also straight. I fit every prerequisite to be hated reviled and mocked. Yummy tastes soo good.
@PosterformerlyknownasElizabeth I always wondered about the patron saints growing up as a kid in a Catholic school xD It always fascinated me (in a fun way) about how God might delegate down… like the saints are cabinet ministers. And esp since I was also interested in politics, I kinda started putting them together and wondering if God moves them around, like in cabinet shuffles. Esp once I found out there was a patron saint of hemorrhoids and of lost car keys! And I wonder if it’s like “you, patron saint of lost children, too many children are still being lost under your watch, you’re being demoted to patron saint of hemorrhoids!” xD
*highfive Ami* Harassment would be a perfect 5th horseman. He’d be an MRA, and have a war banner that says BUT WHAT ABOUT TEH MENZ.
Look NWO. I don’t mock Jews or Muslims or Hindus or Christians or whoever because I don’t think it’s acceptable to mock peoples’ religions. You take your own beliefs very seriously, yes? Other people (surprise!!) also take their own beliefs seriously. The end :)
NWOaf, seriously, all elephant hating aside, why do you assume you are better then Jesus?
Not only did he not hate the hookers, he also never hated the elephant.
NWO – I’m not making fun of you because you’re white or a man or a Christian.
I’m making fun of you because you hate elephants so much and you refuse to even discuss the elephant issue.
hahaha, that is a good point Ami-I was just appointed the patron saint of Oreos which means on my birthday they have no calories.
@ Elizabeth: She made me patron saint of LolCats and Trollmocking, but I still mock her :)
And, wow, Slavey became a Christian after doing research? I thought he was just raised Christian.
Being a convert makes so much sense, and no wonder he picked the most hateful, misogynist branch of Christianity he could find.
You think NWO finds that nun sexy? I doubt it; she definitely looks older than 14.
I have to say, I’d probably be more outraged by this piece if I didn’t know of women who also treat church like a singles mixer. Don’t get me wrong , I’ve never heard any women talk about church hopping in an attempt to nail as many hot guys as possible. But I’ve known a fair number who picked their places of worship based on how many eligible men seemed to be members. No pun intended.
Or maybe I did intend it. It’s hard to compete with Amused’s “pump-and-crusade”. Hilarious.
@Victoria von Syrus
Being a convert makes so much sense, and no wonder he picked the most hateful, misogynist branch of Christianity he could find.
Star Wars?
Was this post intended to make a mockery of the anger about the altar boy that was awarded a $5 million verdict from the Catholic church the other day?
(Damn, I need to get a troll log in.)
… you’ve lost me on Star Wars, Ami. Is it a reference to Slavey’s preference for Star Wars novels?
The Slave is hated and banned from many places.
You love it and you know it.
@Lady Victoria Von Syrus Yus. xD Mostly it was a non sequitur.
Oh, ok! Carry on! :)
Sigh…
No, that would mean the commentor would be anti-semetic or Islamophobic.
You’re not even wrong.
Of course, many churches have active singles groups. Of course, I’d imagine few of them provide these groups for the purpose of making life easier for PUAs.
Me, I’ve been frequenting Shaker singles groups in my area. Haven’t gotten lucky yet, but I’m sure it’ll happen before long, right?
I thought about joining the Friends but I hate getting up early in the morning. :(
Of course Footslave’s a Christian. What other faith would allow him to lie to himself constantly, and justify lying to other people, and still allow him to deceive himself into thinking he’s a good person?
Oh right, all of them.
I don’t know why y’all are hung up on mocking religions. I LOVE mocking religions? They are so funny and crazy and silly! I don’t respect people’s beliefs, I respect people. I give respect to beliefs if they are coherent and evidence-based. Otherwise, your belief system is fair game.
Like Slavey thinking that an evolutionary bottleneck is proof of the literal truth of the account in Genesis. Hilarious!
Err, awkward punctuation mistake: that should be,
“I LOVE mocking religions!!”
No question mark there.
Wow, cynikal, I now love the phrase “not even wrong.” It applies to virtually everything NWO has ever said on this site.
I thought about joining the Friends but I hate getting up early in the morning.
Yeah, I could see myself hanging with Chandler, but I think Joey would get on my nerves after a while.
(Actually, I hate them all). :P
SallyStrange – I don’t mean to be starting a disputation here, but the whole point of religion is that it isn’t based on physical evidence, and that’s okay. I have beliefs that I can’t offer up hard data to support, and since I don’t use those beliefs to judge or control others, I don’t need to justify them.
Atheism is a valid belief, but atheism isn’t the only valid belief. Acting like your belief system is obviously and transparently the only real one is… as fanatical and intolerant as you might think religion is.
Silly CB, Friends are not quite the same. Less annoying for one.
@Elizabeth: Ohmigod, Church kittehs! So cute! =DD
And Slavie, I, too, would like to know why you hate elephants so much. All you ever can talk about is your hatred for these beautiful, slow-paced creatures. They are truly wonderful, and your hatred for them is such a tragedy. In fact, dare I say, it’s the elephant in the room!
giraffes = good, elephants = bad
NWO: It’s alright to mock you because you are mockworthy. I’m a white man. I’m straight. I’m (fundamentally) christian.
No one is mocking me.
Then again, I see that the guy President Obama had host a talk… he’s a white Cristian who mocks homosexuals. He’s still doing all right. Heck, he was the guy who gave the benediction for I forget what presidential event. Must suck to be a white, Christian homophobe.
But really, Dave is defending Christians, why don’t you want him to defend Christians. Are you really supporting people who think church is a place to use as a meat market?
Why are you so anti-christian?
CB: Soon as they see how much Shakin’ you can do, they’ll be all over it.
Beth: Friends call that, “Worshipping the Pillow”
elephant hatred in, elephant hatred out
Really? Billions of religious people would dispute that statement. They really think they have physical evidence. But they’re wrong. They’re being deceived, usually by people who know better and choose to do it anyway. Sometimes they’re deceiving themselves. And that’s one of the reasons religion is so toxic: it’s based on lies, it teaches that it’s not only okay, it’s a positive character trait to believe in something for which there is no evidence, or even something that is actively contradicted by the evidence.
But even if they didn’t, I would still maintain that if you are basing a belief system on a series of evidence-free fantasies, it’s still not okay. Humans are already prone to spotting patterns where none exist. The last thing we need to do is encourage that tendency.
My pillow is pretty awesome-it gives me the miracle of sleep.
Elephant hatred is just truncated affection. Somewhere, sometime, and elephant rejected him, and it’s led to the sorry state he’s in now.
He’ll never forget the elephant. It was so white, and so delightsome.
Speaking as an experienced and enthusiastic religion-mocker, it really takes a high degree of willful stupidity to mistake what David wrote for mockery of Christians. But then, NWFootslave is one of the most wilfully stupid trolls I’ve ever encountered.
You want to argue about young earth creationism sometime, Slavey? Come on over to Pharyngula sometime and try your hand. I’d lay odds on a total and complete meltdown within 32 hours.
Prove me wrong.
“Now we’ve got a truth to die for!” “No. Men should die for lies. But the truth is too precious to die for.”
— (Terry Pratchett, Small Gods)
@NWOslave
Maybe I can’t defend Dave from charges of unfairness to Christianity, but please allow me to defend liberalism as a whole.
Here is a whole page of drawings of the Muslim prophet Muhammad, offensive by their very nature. And if you scroll down, you can see that some of them of are as sexual and offensive as the image of the “nun” above. My personal favorite is Muhammad in a revealing bathing suit in front of a gay pride flag.
http://friendlyatheist.com/2011/05/20/draw-muhammad-day-2-a-compilation/
Nearly all of the people who hang out on that blog and created those images are mainstream liberals. Big ol’ welfare-state lovin’, homosexual coddlin’, feminist, pacifist, Democrat-votin’ liberals.
So there. Prove me wrong.
It gets to the point where NWOslave becomes so self-mocking that there is no need for anyone else to do it.
Holly Pervocracy…
I have to disagree. Either there is a single god, multiple gods, or no god/s. They can’t all be real and true. People can be convinced of one or the other, but that doesn’t make them correct. I’m a staunch atheist, I’m convinced there are no gods, but should it happen that there is one or more deities floating about, then my lack of belief would turn out to be wrong.
That said, there’s nothing wrong with people having wrong beliefs as long as it’s not harmful to other people – reproductive choice and marriage equality being two major examples.
SallyStrange – Billions of religious people would dispute that statement. They really think they have physical evidence. But they’re wrong. They’re being deceived, usually by people who know better and choose to do it anyway.
Ahem. I am a religious person. (I’m not much for organized religion, but I’m a pantheist and believe that existence itself is divine.) I would not like you to tell me what I think and how I got to thinking it.
I think it’s wrong when someone uses religion for evil, but that doesn’t cover every non-physical belief out there. Some people use religion for comfort or to motivate charity.
I agree that one shouldn’t deny or lie about physical reality, but I don’t think there’s proof (or can be proof, which is okay) that physical reality is the only one. I don’t use my perception of non-physical reality to dictate my physical actions and certainly no one else’s, so my belief in the non-physical is harmless. Am I wrong? It’s still harmless.
And not worth being a jerk about.